What’s New
For an archive of still older What’s New entries, please go here.
• Feast of Easter Sunday and St. Vincent Ferrer,
2015 (4-5-15)
Posted Part Six of the book, Baptismal Confusion, which now takes us through Chapter 169.
Also, made an addition to Part Five (namely, Chapters 128-132,
which briefly address the salvation heresy --- the lie that someone of sound
mind can die without professing the Roman Catholic Faith in the state of a
supposedly ‘invincible ignorance’ along with a presumed
‘sincerity of heart’ --- and show, from very distinguished and
authoritative orthodox testimony from of old, how anyone can know that this lie
is indeed a heresy), and an edit to Part Four (specifically, trimmed
Chapters 91-100, which I had always thought were rather messy, but, feeling
pressed for time, had put on the website as they were at the time). On top of this, have corrected half a dozen or so typos that,
somehow, still survived in the text till recently.
Part Six, by the way, turns the reader’s attention to Sacred
Scripture.
What does the Bible have to say about the conflict between WO
(‘water only’) and BOD (‘baptism of desire’)?
Unfortunately, not very much. Sacred Scripture is the weakest
of evidence for either side. Just as unfortunately, though, partisans for both
sides act as if this is not so.
For instance,
most English-speaking BODers of a less educated
background have embraced the BOD stance because the early 20th
century catechism they grew up with --- the Baltimore Catechism --- insists
that ‘baptism of desire’ is true and claims, without providing
quotes or even any references, that the Bible says it is so.
Hence, it
behooves us, in a book purporting to clear up the confusion about baptism, to
address the scriptural arguments of these partisans, too.
Because both
sides --- where clever enough to cite passages from Sacred Scripture --- have
certain verses that they love to trot out and display for the amazement of
those who are already inclined to believe what the presenter is claiming to
‘prove’.
Or, to put it
differently, the Bible is just another example of circumstantial
evidence put forth as if it’s ironclad evidence that cannot be reasonably or rightly
interpreted in any other way than as the purported ‘proof’ that a
WO or a BOD position is ‘correct’ and thus beyond doubt.
The problem is, Sacred Scripture is so circumstantial
when it comes to the question of WO vs. BOD that it is impossible to quote verses and expect someone who is intelligent
& just to accept these arguments without grave reservations or pithy
skepticism!
Enough about
this, though. Read the book, my dear reader, to understand what the controversy
is about. Meanwhile, let us move on to a final note about the date of this
posting.
Today is April 5th.
For the year 2015, it’s Easter Sunday. However, as well-informed or observant
people know, Easter never occurs on the same calendar date two years in a row.
This is because the date of Easter for any particular year depends on the
phases of the moon, in addition to the start of spring and the neverending cycle of the days of the week.
But the phases
of the moon never perfectly synchronize with the length of a solar year. Ergo,
the date of Easter moves around every year, jumping as much as a
month-and-a-half.
Yet why should
the phases of the moon have anything to do with this in the first place?
Because the
The New
Testament Church kept this lunar influence but did not want to always celebrate
Easter on the same day as the Jews celebrated their Passover feast.
Consequently, the date of Easter in our solar-based calendar can move around
dramatically from year to year, as the full moon happens closer to, or further
away from, the first day of spring.
What, though,
was the solar calendar date
for the very first Easter Sunday?
Scholars have
argued about this for centuries. Most of the modern, anti-Christian stuff is
ridiculous. Such scholars (or scientists) have little respect for, or knowledge
of, ancient testimony. As a result, they merely cherry-pick the stuff they want
to take seriously from ancient accounts (if only from the ancient testimony of
the Gospels) and then build a theory based on this along with lots of
out-of-thin-air assumptions and personal prejudices.
Notwithstanding,
there is a very ancient tradition that says Jesus was crucified upon March 25th.
If true, then that day was Good Friday, and Easter Sunday would have been March
27th.
Further
affirmation for this ancient tradition comes from Ven. Mary of Agreda, who I personally consider to be amongst the
greatest of saints. She received a lengthy and detailed private revelation from
the Blessed Virgin Mary Herself concerning the hidden lives of the Holy Family,
and was constrained by obedience to her Franciscan superiors to write it down
over the course of some ten years.
This writing
became the publication, The City of God
(which shares an identical title with
Incidentally, Agreda’s testimony confirmed a calendrical
investigation that I had been carrying on informally, during my spare time, for
several years prior to discovering her work. That is to say, I had been
investigating the history of our solar calendar, which originated with the
Roman Empire as the Julian Calendar roughly a half century before
Christ’s Birth, and which became known as the Gregorian Calendar in the
16th century after a few tweaks to make sure the calendar kept track
with the seasons better.
This investigation
led me to conclude that Jesus was not crucified and resurrected in AD 33
as everyone nowadays assumes (everyone, that is, who at least acts like they
believe Jesus was real and that Sacred Scripture is to be taken seriously).
The reasoning is
simple. The Gospels tell us Jesus was about thirty years old when He began
preaching throughout the cities & towns of
Therefore, Jesus
was, at a bare minimum, 33 years old when He died and resurrected.
However,
earliest tradition and the Catholic Church’s ancient liturgy tell us
Jesus was born on December 25th. (We haven’t time to go into
detail about it here, but the kneejerk modern skepticism regarding this date is
a bunch of nonsense.) Meanwhile, Sacred Scripture, earliest tradition and the
Catholic Church’s ancient liturgy tell us, as well, that Jesus died and
resurrected at the beginning of spring --- which is several months after
December.
The upshot?
Even if you take
Jesus’ birthdate as AD 1 --- which most
fervently religious people, who call themselves Christian, do --- then,
obviously, December 25, AD 1, plus 33 years brings you to AD 34, and not AD 33 as everyone assumes! After all, 1+33=34… and not 33. Then adding a few more
months to bring you to springtime takes you into the year of AD 35.
Notwithstanding,
Ven. Mary of Agreda assures us that Jesus was
actually born on December 25, 1 BC… and not AD 1. Her explanation
is highly intelligent and very persuasive. That, and given her incredible
holiness, not to mention the approbation of multiple popes for her book, makes
me quite confident that she is right.
Again, the upshot?
Taking the
saintly Agreda’s starting point of December 25,
1 BC, adding 33 years to this date brings us to AD 33. Nevertheless, adding a
few more months brings us to spring --- the time when Jesus actually died and
resurrected --- and thus takes us into the following year, AD 34!
This, then, is
the year during which Jesus truly died and resurrected.
Oh, and the date
of March 25?
As I said, Mary
of Agreda confirms the ancient tradition that this is
the day of our solar calendar upon which Jesus was crucified. Thus, March 27,
AD 34, is the day of our solar calendar upon which Jesus resurrected.
This was very
exciting to me when I discovered it. My own calendrical
investigations coincided with her testimony to within one solar calendar day. A single day that bothered me not in the least. For as
anyone knows who has tried to investigate our solar calendar, the niggling
details that govern it and the long time that it has been in effect with
periodic adjustments here-and-there, makes it unimaginably difficult to get a
date precise and absolutely certain when you’re talking about a time that
is nearly two millennia ago.
One day off is
thus pretty darn accurate.
Moreover, I have
no trouble conceding to Ven. Mary of Agreda.
I’m quite confident that she is dead-on right and that I was one day off,
being slightly inaccurate in all of my labyrinthine calculations.
By the way, if
this date is accurate, then, as of today, it has been precisely one thousand
nine hundred and eighty-one years, plus nine days, since Jesus’
Resurrection.
If you’re keeping count.
Yet the further significance of March 25?
It’s right after the start of spring and hence the
beginning of new life.
It’s also the
very same day that Jesus was conceived supernaturally in the womb of His
Mother, the Blessed Ever-Virgin Mary. For, as any good Catholic knows, this is
the day of the Feast of the Annunciation, when St. Gabriel the Archangel
announced to Mary that She would conceive a Son Who was God-in-the-Flesh, and
at Her humble acquiescence the Holy Ghost incarnated Jesus within Her Precious
Womb.
An ancient
tradition, as well, pegs this as the day that God began creating our world.
So, all in all, a pretty significant date.
Not that you
have to believe Jesus died exactly on March 25 in order to be truly Catholic.
It has never been infallibly defined as of yet. Nonetheless, it is a venerable
tradition, and, if you as a Catholic learn of it, knowing how venerable it is,
it would be impious of you --- and hence possibly sinful to the point of
mortality --- to doubt or disbelieve in it without most excellent reason.
Oh, and for the
record, it is the day I inaugurated The Epistemologic Works website. Something
I was well aware of and purposely chose for its symbolism.
But what about St. Vincent Ferrer?
He is an amazing
saint.
He called
himself the ‘Preacher of Judgment’ and, in his sermons, constantly
referenced the Apocalypse (what Protestants know as the Book of Revelation) for
this title. A significant thing for true Catholics, who are
going through the Great Apostasy right now. For, although it may have
been six hundred years ago that he lived, what he warned about actually came to
pass. The Protestant Rebellion, the Endarkenment
(what modern people call the ‘Enlightenment’), the French
Revolution (which was Freemasonic and anti-Catholic), Darwinism (which, as any
intelligent person knows, very much tends to destroy belief in a Creator), the
Sexual Revolution, and etc., etc.
Vincent also
converted untold numbers of sinners, heretics, schismatics,
Jews and infidels from unbelief and wickedness, making them into good members
of the Roman Catholic Church.
Which, of
course, makes him very distasteful to the biases of modern people, but it bears
noting how he, more than anyone else in
It’s
simply that, in addition to this, he converted a whole bunch of Jews to
Catholicism.
Which is a politically incorrect thing to do nowadays in our part
of the world.
Try to do so now
(and, naturally, if you’re not a great saint like Vincent Ferrer, then you will fail terribly) and Jewish people ---
as well as others --- will accuse you of ‘anti-Semitism’.
Yet is it really
‘anti-Semitic’?
Not if the
Catholic Church truly is the only way to save your immortal
soul and live with God in Heaven forever with perfect happiness.
Then, of course,
it’s the most loving thing you could do for anyone in this world, ever.
Period.
• Feast of St. Anacletus
and the 96th Anniversary of the 3rd Apparition of Our
Lady of
Posted Part Five of the book, Baptismal Confusion, which now takes us through Chapter 127.
Continuing with the evidence of the catechisms, we examine the
English Catechism of 1583, the Douay Catechism of 1649, the Penny Catechism,
Baltimore Catechism No. 3, and Christian Doctrine Drills.
What has all of this to tell us about the Sacrament of Baptism and
the notions of ‘baptism of desire’ (BOD) or ‘baptism of
blood’ (BOB)?
Read the post to find out!
Then, tying all of the evidence together and giving a recap, I then
turn to a problem that is beyond the scope of this book --- the salvation heresy
of modern times.
Unfortunately,
the problem cannot be ducked. And so, although the topic will be dealt with
adequately and comprehensively in another book to come (God willing) in the
near future, it has to be touched on here:
Namely, that as
the idea of BOD became enthroned in the thinking of practically everyone who
went by the name of Catholic by the beginning of the 20th
century… at the very same time, the salvation
heresy of modern times was insinuated into the thinking of everyone, too.
The repercussions?
That will be
dealt with more fully in Part Six, which is still to
come. In the meanwhile, please digest everything thoroughly in the latest post.
The story of BOD is fascinating and --- whichever position you may prefer,
whether it be BOD or WO (‘water only’) --- you need to know,
understand and humbly admit, that the Church has never yet with infallibility of an explicit nature
pronounced upon the subject one way or another. To fail to admit this
invariably leads a soul into heresy or schism, both of which are damnable
situations.
I beg you, my
dear reader, not to fall into such a horrid condition!
Incidentally, I
have updated this website on the Feast of St. Anacletus,
who was second in line after
We therefore put
our trust in the Triune Catholic God, and His Son’s Mother, the Blessed
Ever-Virgin Mary.
Speaking of Whom, this is the 96th anniversary today of Her
third appearance to the three shepherd children at
First, She imparted to them a Secret, part of which --- now called
the ‘Third Secret of Fatima’ --- has never yet been fully and
properly revealed to the Catholic world. It was supposed to be released
publically in 1960 by the
Second, the
Blessed Virgin first foretold to the children that She
would perform a great miracle at Her sixth appearance on October 13th.
This is what became known as the Miracle of the Sun, when some 70,000 people
watched the sun ‘dance’ across the sky and seem to fall from its
place in the heavens upon a terrified crowd. Immediately after this, the
rain-soaked observers were inexplicably dry and even the Masonic newspapers,
who had hitherto mocked the events at
And, third, the
poor shepherd children were given a horrifying and flabbergasting vision of
hell at the very center of our earth, seeing the monstrous forms of the
tormenting demons and the pathetic souls of the damned perishing eternally in
its flames.
This final thing
is particularly applicable to our times. For in the less than one hundred years
that have passed since this event, our world has become only more evil than it
was then… and it was pretty bad already in the early twentieth century.
That is to say, people the world over are only more immoral and more apostate
or rebellious or blind toward the Catholic Religion than they were then --- and
they were already pretty apostate, rebellious and blind at that relatively
early date!
And, of course,
any real Catholic knows that this means that even more souls are headed for
hell. Because there is no Salvation outside the Catholic Church, and there is
no Salvation even for someone who is in the Catholic Church if this person is a
bad Catholic and in the state of mortal sin. The Vision of Hell, consequently,
is a vision that should haunt any real Catholic.
Haunt us,
because, even if Catholic, we will not go to Heaven if our souls are not
in the state of grace, and everlasting
hell will be our fate for such a careless condition. And haunt us, because every
human being --- no matter how wicked --- is made in the image of God
and thus is a priceless immortal soul, an immortal soul that will certainly languish in the fiery torments of
hell forever if he does not enter the Roman Catholic Body of Jesus Christ
before he ends his life in this temporal world.
If truly
Catholic, then, I beg you to take heed of your immortal soul and practice
virtue for the sake of Neverending Heavenly Life. And
if not truly Catholic, I beg you to take heed of your immortal soul and begin
with the first necessary virtue in this earthly life… which is to love
your Almighty Creator enough that you would obey His command to join His Body
on earth, the Holy Roman Catholic Church, and so have real hope of Eternal Life
in the world to come.
This website now
has plenty of resources to help you to do so, and plenty more to come, I pray,
in the not-too-distant future.
Our Lady of
Amen.
• Feasts of Our Lady of
Uploaded Part Four of the book, Baptismal Confusion, which takes us through Chapter 105.
Turning to the evidence of catechisms when it comes to ‘baptism
of desire’ (BOD) vs. ‘water only’ (WO), we first find that no
catechism yet has ever been infallible in every single one of its words.
Proof of this assertion is easy to see, both from the infallible & explicit
definition of Pope Pius IX via the Vatican Council in 1879 about the nature of
papal infallibility and from a scholarly & imprimatured text of a famous
English translation of the Catechism of the Council of Trent published in the
early 20th century.
Then, going from the fourth century with its Catechism of St. Cyril
of Jerusalem --- who was a doctor and father of the Catholic Church --- we jump
to Trent’s Catechism itself, finding that the former mentions only ‘baptism of blood’
(BOB) as an exception to the otherwise absolute necessity of water baptism,
while the latter mentions BOD briefly, but not explicitly by name. Meanwhile,
we show that it is nevertheless morally certain that this greatest of all
catechisms speaks of BOD, however fleetingly, and that it is thus a moral
certainty, too, that Trent never explicitly by name ruled out the
possibility of BOD.
Yet if a hardcore WOer still balks, then
we also look at a famous doctor of the Church and Jesuit cardinal, St. Robert Bellarmine --- who was the personal theologian of two popes
and lived after
Notwithstanding, should this plain proof not be enough for a
Catholic fundamentalist (CF) WO enthusiast, then we re-visit
Pray God and His
Holy Virginal Mother that these new additions go far in preventing either BOD
supporters or WO aficionados from going schismatic or heretical over the
theological dispute between the two opposing sides. If but one soul is recovered
from such a deadly situation of mortal sin, it will be worth every minute of
study, prayer & sweat.
Today, by the
way, is the feast (albeit not yet a universally decreed feast) of Our Lady of
Fatima, arguably the greatest Marian apparition that has ever occurred. She
first appeared to the three little Portuguese shepherd children of Fatima ---
Lucia, Francisco and Jacinta --- on May 13th, 1917. She then
appeared to them every month thereafter on the 13th (except for
August, when they were imprisoned by a Masonic ruler, and Blessed Mary appeared
to them on the 19th instead) until October 13th when, by
the Power of the Triune Catholic God Almighty, She performed the flabbergasting
Miracle of the Sun.
During these
apparitions She warned that
Ergo, the
promise She gave for that poor nation’s
conversion to the Roman Catholic Faith has not yet been fulfilled. And, indeed,
In short, what
few true Catholics are left today are laboring under the heavy tyranny of
atheistic and anti-Catholic rulers, who bear no love or understanding for the
One True Faith of Jesus’ Singular Catholic Body. All the same, Mary did
promise us through the Fatima children that a pope would eventually consecrate
(Some
WO-espousing CFs, by the way, dare to call the early
20th century popes ‘antipopes’ and thereby also deny and
cast aspersions upon Our Lady of Fatima. May God forgive them, since they know
not what they do and attack the Blessed Ever-Virgin Mother of God. You may read a short but detailed refutation of this
mistaken idea in the book, Was Benedict XV an
Antipope? Specifically, Chapters 34 and 35 in this book.)
Incidentally,
this is, as well, the fifth anniversary of The Epistemologic
Works website. Precisely five years ago today, on Our Lady’s feast under
the name of
Finally, this is
today, in addition, the feast of a great doctor of the Catholic Church, St.
Robert Bellarmine, who powerfully opposed the
religious falsehoods of the newly-minted Protestants of his time (the late
1500s to the early 1600s). I, also, have opposed Protestant falsehoods,
although not with the eloquence and holiness of he,
such a great saint. But how apropos that Part 4 of Baptismal Confusion that I’ve just posted today should
include two chapters in description of him, and using his testimony in writing
to help clarify and resolve the absolutely horrible confusion over water
baptism that reigns now amongst those who call themselves Catholic and may
actually be so. Until this confusion is banished, the Visible Body of the Holy
Catholic Faith cannot be fully and rightly resurrected!
Our Lady of
Fatima, Queen of Highest Heaven, please help us in our most desperate need and
crush the Serpent’s Head who dares to defy you and spew his venom in the Face
of Almighty God. By Your powerful prayers, please obtain for us the fulfillment
of the promise you made via the little Fatima shepherds, and give to us a pope
who will obey your request to consecrate Russia publicly by name along with all
of the Catholic bishops of the earth, and so convert Russia wholly and
miraculously to the Catholic Faith, that she might bless the world rather than
subvert it with her errors!
And
• Ascension Day & Feast of St. Gregory Nazianzen, 2013 (5-9-13)
Posted Part Three of Baptismal
Confusion, which amounts to Chapters 61 to 82, and covers a doctor, saint
& theologian who are both powerful theological evidence and powerful
historical evidence against the notion of ‘baptism of desire’
(BOD). That is to say, BOD supporters usually assume --- out of thin air and
without even knowing any better --- that BOD has been
defined by the Church or around in common belief amongst Catholics since the
beginning with Jesus and His Apostles.
In reality, this is not
the case. Read the just-posted chapters to see hard proof for this assertion.
Indeed, read the entire book as it is posted if you are either a committed BODer or staunch WOer (‘water
only’ enthusiast), or if you don’t know what to think about the two
sides.
And what a beautiful day to upload it… the day Jesus Christ
ascended bodily into Heaven to sit at the right hand of His Father, and from
where He sent the Third Person of the Trinity, the Holy Ghost, to vivify His
Singular Body, the Roman Catholic Church on the Day of Pentecost.
The Doctrine of the Ascension is crucial to the Dogma of Salvation,
too. The Gospels tell us that no man has ascended into Heaven except He Who
descends from Heaven, which is God Himself --- Jesus alone --- and no one else.
Meanwhile, how are we, mere human beings, to enter into Heaven since we never
came from there in the first place?
Elementary, my dear Watson. We join ourselves baptismally to the
Singular Body of He Who is God and Who descended from
Heaven --- Jesus --- and, by dying in the state of grace, thereby ascend into
Heaven along with His Ecclesial Body.
And what is this
Body of His?
The Roman Catholic Church and none other.
Which, by the way, is highly offensive and irritating to most
people. In their offense and irritation they act as if this exclusive
salvation is exclusive in a bad way.
I.e., as if good Catholics are looking at them and going, “Nah nah nah nah
nah. We’re saved and
you’re not. Ha ha!”
When, in
reality, it is the opposite. The good Catholic is praying earnestly that others
join him in the Catholic Body of Jesus Christ --- the real reason for saying
that no one is saved outside the Catholic Church, so that others may know that anyone
can be saved within this Church, and that this exclusive salvation can be
found nowhere else --- and does not dare to presume that he himself, Catholic
though he is, will save his soul unless he is a good Catholic and dies good
in the state of grace.
But this is also
the feast of St. Gregory Nazianzen, who I speak of in
the book, Baptismal Confusion, in
Chapters 62 to 71. A marvelous bishop who recovered many poor lost souls to the
Catholic Faith in Constantinople in Asia Minor (modern day Istanbul in Turkey)
after the lies of the Arian Heresy had ravaged the Roman Empire for the better
part of a century, may this tiny website be, in some small way, a mirror of
what he did there in that city. For just as Arians ultimately denied the
Incarnation (Jesus is God) and its absolute necessity for salvation, so, too,
do Modernists today ultimately deny the Ecclesiation
(Jesus’ Body is the Catholic Church) and its absolute necessity for
salvation.
The denial of
either one will damn a precious soul, casting it outside Jesus’ Catholic
Body, if, truly, it was ever inside to begin with.
Dear reader, let us not be waylaid by these terrible lies!
And let us
oppose them where we can.
Not everyone is
an apostle, or bishop, or priest, or monk, or nun, or what-have-you. But even
the lowliest layperson must uphold the Catholic Faith in the sight of others
where silence is tantamount to denial. In the meantime, even the least of us
can pray and offer sacrifices for the destruction of these horrible religious
lies.
For Your Great
Sake, O Lord, please save us. For Your Great Name, O Lady, please intercede on
our behalves and crush the head of the serpent. Don’t let lies or
confusions have sway any longer… send us the blessed light of truth &
wisdom, for all of us!
• Holy Saturday, 2013 (3-30-13)
Added Part Two of Baptismal
Confusion, as promised, which consists of Chapters 33 to 60 and focuses on
the evidence from the saints, doctors & fathers concerning ‘baptism
of desire’ (BOD) vs. ‘water only’ (WO) when it comes to the
Sacrament of Baptism. Whether a BODer
or a WOer, please look at this section and these
chapters very closely. WOers are exceedingly
ignorant about the overwhelming evidence for BOD found in the later
doctors and saints, whilst BODers are exceedingly
ignorant about the distinct lack of evidence for BOD found in the most
ancient doctors and saints.
Both need a wake up call of knowledge and humility!
Also tweaked the Books & Articles synopsis of Baptismal Confusion slightly, as well as
corrected three typos in Part One of the new book that was already posted
as of March 25th. Too, corrected one typo in the latest entry of
What’s New (till this one, of course…) and corrected one slightly
mistaken piece of information in a much earlier What’s New entry from
2011 (specifically, where I accidentally subtracted one year from the Blessed
Virgin Mary’s human age of 2026 years old at the time, she now being 2027
years old going on 2028 now!).
I hope to have Part Three of Baptismal
Confusion uploaded very soon. It will focus on the evidence from the
saints, doctors & fathers expressly against the BOD theological opinion,
something BODers are blithely unaware of.
Please pray for strength, time and concentration on my part, that I
might be able to finish composition of the last parts of this book as soon as
possible. I cannot, all by myself and in my own cleverness or might, get people
to see straight and act accordingly about the Sacrament of Baptism and this
confusing debate which blinds the minds of both the smart and the ordinary
thinker. I have not the holiness to draw down heavenly graces to miraculously
open men’s eyes, nor the jurisdiction and power
to figuratively knock some heads around until they meekly admit the
truth…
Nevertheless,
the Church cannot be restored properly until this fight is quieted. None of us
--- apart from a real pope --- can settle this issue for good. It will take an
explicit & infallible pronouncement. But we can, in the meantime, be
sensible and gracious and admit that the topic is a matter of theological opinion and not yet a thing of
defined certainty.
That much is
made clear from my book. Pray, then, that Heaven would be merciful and allow
the truth about this to be known --- and humbly acknowledged --- so that the
restoration of the Church’s Visible Body would arrive the more quickly.
As I hinted
several days ago, the devil has all angles covered. Most of the world today is
lost in the lies of modernism or some other false religion. Catholicism is, humanly
speaking, nearly extinct… and yet not totally extinct. Miraculous and
even shocking conversions to real Catholicity still occur, even in the midst of
all the darkness and unbelief. I am proof of this, since I converted out of
nowhere from Evangelic Protestantism during the 1990s.
The point is,
how tragic that the few converts there are, if not swept away by various forms
of false ‘catholicity’ (conservative novus
ordoism or traditional novus
ordoism, mainly, who are subject to the salvation
heresy which claims grown up people of adequate mind can be saved while
ignorant of the truth of the Catholic Faith and dying visibly in the practice
of a false religion), are then overwhelmed by the flood of this baptismal
confusion and propelled into either heresy or schism because of it!
Either is
damnable, and either can damn a man.
This is what the
devil has been allowed to accomplish today.
The path to
eternal salvation has always been narrow, as Jesus makes plain near the end of
Chapter 7 in the Gospel of St. Matthew. Yet narrower still has this precious
path become during the Great Apostasy when even those who make it so far as to
know and believe the Catholic Faith… what precious few there are…
are then torn into the hideousness of schism or the equal hideousness of
heresy, the pair being but two sides of the same evil coin.
Most Sacred
Hearts of Jesus & Mary, please save us from our
ignorance, impatience, pride and stubbornness.
Please save us.
Not because we deserve it --- for we don’t, since we are so wicked ---
but for the sake of your One & Only Catholic Body, that it might be
restored and no longer mocked or insulted.
For Your Great
Sake, O Lord, please save us. For Your Great Name, O Lady, please intercede on
our behalves and crush the head of the serpent. Don’t let lies or
confusions have sway any longer… send us the blessed light of truth &
wisdom, for all of us!
• The Feast of the Annunciation and Monday in Holy Week,
2013 (3-25-13)
First post in a year and a half! What have I been doing all that
time?
Governing and supporting a large family, which takes a lot of
strength and effort.
Yet also studying for and composing a large book, called Baptismal Confusion: What the Fight Over
‘Baptism of Desire’ vs. ‘Water Only’ Is All About and Where Both Sides Get It Very Wrong, Falling into
Heresy or Schism as a Result.
Perhaps the title is a clue --- and, yes, I do dare to say that
most subjects dealt with on this website are important --- nevertheless, the
subject of this book is particularly important. Not because everyone is
Catholic; most people are not today. But because those very
few people who really may be Catholic are sucked up onto one side or the other
of this conflict… and then become heretical or schismatic as a
consequence, falling out of Jesus’ One & Only Catholic Body.
A most tragic situation! Is there a remedy?
There most certainly
is. And it comes from close study, good sense and humble honesty. That is to
say, lay aside your prejudices and your impatience, pretend for a moment that
you don’t know everything you need to know already (this is a tough one
for most of us, I realize), put your thinking cap on carefully, learn all that
you can about both sides of the argument (and not just the side you
already want to think is ‘right’) and be humble & honest about
what you find out.
There. Now is
that so hard?
Unfortunately
for many of us, it is. We so badly want to be right… and so eagerly want
to believe everyone else is wrong. And, to make it more interesting, the
Catholic Church really is absolutely right when it comes to faith & morals!
But does that mean that you, as a Catholic, are therefore right about
everything just because you want to think you are, and that you don’t
have to be humble and admit that you don’t know everything --- and that
it’s worth your while to study something in detail that is fought over
hard before you dare to say you’ve got it figured out correctly?
The answer is
clear for anyone who uses his God-given mind and doesn’t have a terrible
sin of pride, as well as wrestle with chilling fear at the prospect of being in
the wrong. The Catholic Church is
infallibly right --- but we, mere mortals that we are despite being members of
this Church, must study to make sure that we understand this Church’s
infallible pronouncements correctly before we go around acting like we
couldn’t be wrong… especially when it comes to a much disputed
topic amongst real Catholics that the Church has never yet both explicitly
& infallibly declared upon!
The exact
parameters of the Sacrament of Baptism are not yet drawn by the Infallible
Authority of the Church in absolutely explicit and clear words. We know by
infallible dogma that water baptism is necessary --- that much is explicitly
taught by the Church. What we don’t know is what that necessity amounts
to… an absolute necessity or a preceptive necessity? That is, are there ever
any exceptions to the need for water (e.g., will God let a good-willed
catechumen die ‘accidentally’ before he gets baptized in water and
still let him into Heaven?), or has God made it absolutely necessary to receive
sacramental water in every situation (and thus a good-willed catechumen will
get that baptismal water no matter what before he dies)?
This is what the
fight is over.
Already got your
mind made up? Too proud to admit that you could be wrong and that you
don’t know everything already?
Why, then, of
course, it’s a waste of your precious time to read this book.
But are you
humble, and ready to confess that you could still
learn something… and that it might end up making you acknowledge that
you’re on the wrong side of the
fight, or that neither side is
completely right?
Then read the
book, my dear soul. Heaven and Hell are at stake. The devil wants you, and a
‘little thing’ like being Catholic is not going to deter him. This
is where he gets most of the people who are Catholic --- what few there are
nowadays --- to go astray into heresy or schism, acting dogmatic about what has
not yet become a perfectly explicit and infallible dogma of the Roman
Catholic Church.
Most Sacred Hearts of Jesus & Mary! O Blessed Ever-Virgin
Mother of God, Whose Immaculate Soul the sword still pierces as your children
are ravished and devoured by the wolf let loose upon the world today. Have
mercy on us, your poor wandering children! Crush the Serpent’s Head and
free us from his poison. Without You we are lost. We
put our trust in You and in Your Divine Son. Please
don’t let us perish and fall into hell!
• The Feasts of the Seven Sorrows of the Blessed
Virgin Mary and St. Nicomedes, 2011 (9-15-11)
Posted part one of a new book, Mary Exalted. In it I go through Sacred
Scripture carefully and explain even more carefully --- with ironclad logic and
simple good sense --- why it is that the Blessed Virgin Mary is so highly
venerated by good Roman Catholics. And that this is as it should be… the
Virgin Mary being God’s Most Admirable Creature by far!
In actuality, it’s not quite so
new; I posted it first thing when I uploaded the website in May of 2008.
However, it was only part of the home page as you scroll down --- and how many
people pay close attention to that? But I did edit it and change the font style
significantly late last year. Now it has a proper place of its own, standing
alone as a book in the Books & Articles section of this website. Hopefully,
this will gain it a little bit more readership amongst those very few souls who
really do care for the truth, and who want to gain the great & mighty
salvation that Our Creator has prepared for those who humbly believe what He
has proclaimed through His Son’s Body, the Church, which is the Pillar
& Foundation of the Truth, and which He has wrought through His Son’s
Mother, the Blessed Ever-Virgin Mary.
Also posted an
expanded Quiklinks frame on the right. It now has not
only recent posts but, in blog-like fashion, an
alphabetical list of all pages that I have posted to this website. Again, it
increases the odds that someone will find and pay close attention to something
that could prove salvific for his immortal soul. Because
a surfer might not bother to search each section, whereas he just may, scanning
the easy to scroll list of 109 pages (thus far), see a title that catches his
fancy and read it unto a full understanding, profiting his soul.
And a word about
the Virgin Mary’s Seven Sorrows. They are, in this exact order:
1) the words of St. Simeon about the sword piercing Her soul at the
Presentation of Jesus in the Temple; 2) the flight into Egypt to save the life
of Jesus, leaving everything they knew behind them in Palestine; 3) the loss of
Jesus at age twelve in Jerusalem, it taking Joseph & Mary three days to
find him; 4) Jesus carrying His Cross through the streets of Jerusalem and
meeting His Mother along the way; 5) Jesus being crucified upon the Cross and
dying in front of His Mother’s eyes; 6) Jesus being taken down from the
Cross and His Bloody & Bruised Body placed dead in Her arms; and 7) Jesus
being laid in the Tomb as His Mother watches, seeing Him for the last time
prior to His Resurrection.
There are special promises & blessings
associated with reflection upon these sorrows, or dolors.
They are intimately akin to the Stations of the Cross and the terrible horrors
& sufferings that Her Divine Son, Jesus, endured during His Passion &
Crucifixion. The two of them are like one, the Immaculate & Sorrowful Heart
of Mary inextricably merging with and attached to the Sacred & Suffering
Heart of Jesus. This is the essence of --- and secret to --- Her being the Co-Redemptress. For though She could not redeem or save
Humankind without Her Son, He being absolutely necessary to Our Salvation, God
in His Eternal Wisdom chose to execute His Salvation through Her and never
without Her, it being Her Blood & Flesh that Jesus wore like a Sacred Veil,
the Sacrifice of which was the means of Our Glorious Redemption in His Body via
the Sacrament of Baptism and Profession of the Catholic Religion. And this is
why God prophesied right from the beginning in the Garden at the Fall of Man,
saying to that ancient serpent, the Devil, “She shall crush your head…”
Not He --- and even though it was Jesus, Her Son, Who died upon the Cross,
literally accomplishing the Redemption! But She --- it being Her Flesh &
Blood shed upon the Cross by which He consummated the Eternal Sacrifice.
Praised be the Sacred Hearts of Jesus
& Mary! O Most Divine Heart of Jesus, have mercy on us. O Most Immaculate
Heart of Mary, pray for us. Ad Jesum per Mariam!
• The Feasts of the Nativity of the Blessed
Ever-Virgin Mary and St. Adrian, 2011 (9-8-11)
New article posted called Modest Dress: What It Is and Why It Is So
Crucial. Ever wondered about the way we clothe ourselves nowadays in this
part of the world, my dear reader? Does it make sense to you? Or, if liking the
way we dress, do you nevertheless realize it’s drastically different ---
and at complete odds --- with the way people in our part of the world used to
dress less than a century or two ago? What happened? Was it a mere change of ‘styles’?
Yet how could it have merely amounted to a change in styles when the way we
dress now would have been condemned and hissed at by the average person in the
mid-1800s as shocking, immoral & reprehensible?
You see where I’m headed with
this. It’s not mere ‘style’… it’s a matter of
morality. Something changed in us as a people in the last hundred years,
something that began happening in the previous century to that but only
culminated in our times, in the past fifty years. Our sense of right &
wrong shifted drastically. And while I don’t get into the nitty gritty details of why that shift occurred, I do
explain carefully why we, as real Roman Catholics, must defy that change in our own lives. That is to say, we cannot
dress the way most everyone else dresses today. Not because we relish being odd
or want to stick out like sore thumbs, but because modesty in clothing is
something that both God and His Church command us to practice. Not sure what to
make of it? Or not certain where to draw the line in the clothing you wear?
And, yet, do you call yourself Catholic? Then dig in and read the article! You
can find a quick link at the top of the far right frame. Or go to the link for
Books & Articles (B&A) in the far left frame and scroll down till you
find the hyperlinked title listed alphabetically.
Also posted a companion page to the Modest Dress article called A Chart for Modest Dress. It’s
literally just what it says it is --- a rapid way at one glance to see the
guidelines for how Catholics should dress, whether man or woman. You can find a
quick link at the right for it, or go to the B&A section. It can also be
linked to from inside the Modest Dress
article itself.
Finally, a word
on the wonderful feast day today. The nativity --- or birth --- of the
Mother of God is one of the greater solemnities celebrating Her
in the Catholic Church. While not a holy day of obligation in the
Yet how old is She
exactly in terms of years today? Believe it or not, we can know the answer to
that question. Sacred Scripture tells us that she was in her fifteenth year
when She conceived Jesus in Her Womb. That is to say,
past what we’d call fourteen years old, but not yet fifteen. And Jesus’
conception was on March 25, precisely nine months prior to his birth upon
December 25th. Yet Her birthday happened
between those two dates. Hence, if she was what we’d call fourteen (the
Jews termed it differently, counting inclusively in contrast to our habit of
counting exclusively) when She conceived Jesus, then
the Blessed Virgin Mary was fifteen when She gave birth to Jesus. Now, Jesus was
born at the very end of BC 1, per a incredibly saintly nun named Mary of Agreda.
Therefore, Mary was fifteen years old on September 8, BC 1. Consequently,
She had to have been born on September 8, 16 BC.
Which means, then, too --- remembering that there is no year zero --- that
She is two thousand and twenty-six years old today.
Happy 2026th Birthday, My Dearest & Most Celestial of Ladies!
Thank the Triune Catholic God that He gave us You as Our Heavenly Queen!
• The Feast of St. Jane Frances Fremiot de Chantal,
2011 (8-21-11)
Re-posted Should You Go to a CMRI Mass or Take Part in the Worship of Other Traditionalists?
with several additions meant to
address the questions or concerns of certain readers. Nothing in the gist of
the article is changed; its points are merely made with even greater scope
& clarity. As an example of what I’m talking about, certain people are concerned about
the words of Pope Innocent III through the 4th Lateran Council
regarding the avoidance of heretics. Doesn’t this mean,
thought they, that Catholics are justified in receiving the sacraments from ‘undeclared’
heretics… that is, if the Hierarchy has not yet explicitly condemned them by
name? And the answer: not at all. I had already addressed this concern in
dealing with Pope Martin V’s Ad evitanda scandala. However,
to make it perfectly clear to all of my potential readers, I have now included
the words of the 4th Lateran Council in the article, explaining how
they are to be rightly understood and why they can’t change anything for
the truly Catholic soul when comes to dealing with heresy or schism. Or, to put
it differently, how the Church has never deviated on this matter by one
single iota --- notorious & pertinacious heretics or schismatics are automatically
excommunicated, despite no formal declaration from the Hierarchy, and we are
hence, once aware of their notorious crime, to avoid them in all things
religious from that point in time onward!
Fervent disciple of that saint of
apologetics,
• The Feast of St. Igatius
of Loyola, 2011 (7-31-11)
Added another
new article to the Books & Articles (B&A) section. It’s
called Should You Go to a CMRI Mass or Take Part in the
Worship of Other Traditionalists? Many people claiming to be Catholic
nowadays are confused about this matter. They may hold the Salvation Dogma
correctly --- not allowing for loopholes where a supposedly ‘invincible
ignorance’ will let someone into Heaven regardless of not professing the
One True Religion whole & entire --- but they either think the
traditionalists don’t teach salvation heresy or don’t think God
cares if we get the sacraments from notorious & pertinacious heretics…
or that it’s somehow okay during unusual circumstances like ours, with
nothing else available.
Has that been your attitude as well, my
dear soul? Then please read this article in the B&A now! It is a subject of
eternal life or eternal death, as is so much which I deal with on this website.
And why wouldn’t it be? For this is God’s One & Only True
Church we’re talking about!
How appropriate that I should post this
on the Feast of St. Ignatius. Not to be mixed up with St. Ignatius of
• The Feast of St. Vincent de Paul, 2011 (7-19-11)
Added a new
article to the Books & Articles (B&A) section. It’s
called What Are We to Think of Written Abjurations?
Ever run into the claim, my dear reader, that a baptized heretic must sign a
written abjuration in order to be admitted (or re-admitted) to the Catholic
Church and have hope of saving his soul? And ever wondered if this could be
true? Or, perhaps, you presume it to be true, no questions asked and no doubts
entertained? Then read this article in B&A! You will learn what abjuration
is, why it is necessary, and what the role of signed & written abjurations
is --- if any --- nowadays during the Great Apostasy when no bishops with
jurisdiction are to be found.
Heaven willing, I shall be posting
several more short articles in B&A. I’ve long wanted to address
certain pressing issues regarding Catholicity, especially in the apostate times
that we live in. Keep an eye out for them. They will contain useful information
(even lifesaving information) that everyone needs to know, surrounded by chaos,
confusion & rebellion like we are presently.
Finally, a very
brief note on
• The Feasts of the Most Sacred Heart &
Most Precious Blood of Jesus, 2011 (7-1-11)
Updated a
webpage in the Admonishments subsection of the Letters & Admonishments
section. There are four webpages there presently,
apart from the main page that hyperlinks to the
others. One of them is brand new, having been added just yesterday. Now one of
the remaining three is updated, having a new preface and being converted to the
smaller font that I’ve been using lately. Take a look at this subsection
if you’re Catholic! You’ll find some of the ground rules for when
& how a Catholic should admonish or rebuke his fellow Catholic, and you’ll
discover who to refrain from worshipping with religiously when it comes to some
people that are only pretending to be Catholic, or who may be Catholic but are
schismatic toward certain popes or fellow laypersons.
Today is a very special & unique
day. The Feast of the Most Precious Blood of Jesus always falls on July 1st,
no matter what the year or what the day of the week. Nevertheless, this year it
just happens to fall upon a Friday, which is the day Jesus shed His Most
Precious Blood upon the Cross. However, this alone would not be that unique
since it happens every few years. No, what makes it particularly rare is that
Easter occurred late enough his year that the Feast of the Most Sacred Heart
of Jesus just happened to occur on this
exact Friday --- the same day that the Feast of His Most Precious
Blood is celebrated in 2011! This is exceedingly rare. Indeed, it may be so rare
as to be the first time that it has ever happened in history, considering that these
two feasts don’t go back too many centuries yet. The Feast of the
Most Sacred Heart, like many others, depends intrinsically on the exact date of
Easter in any given year. Notwithstanding, it always falls on a Friday…
but only the first Friday after the Octave of the Feast of Corpus Christi,
which is always on a Thursday… the Thursday following Trinity Sunday,
which in turn follows Pentecost Sunday, which in turn comes seven weeks after
Easter Sunday.
Yet from what does the Precious Blood of
Jesus flow? Right --- His Sacred Heart. Thus, how
glorious & beautiful that these two feasts would fall together this year! His
Sacred Heart represents the Divine Love that He has for Humankind, which has
been created in His Image. It is why He sacrificed Himself upon the Cross,
dying in both bodily and soulful agony. The Blood that flows from this Heart,
though, is the Source of All Life, and the means by which men can redeem
themselves from the awful debt of mortal sin, which takes an eternity to pay…
but which can be remitted in an instant via Baptism of Water and Profession of
the Catholic Faith! This is the free gift of God; it is the love of God for His
creatures of mere flesh. We, who had no reason to expect anything other than a
just condemnation from Our Creator. Most Sacred Heart
of Jesus, have mercy on us! Most Precious Blood of Jesus, we worship & adore
You!
• The Commemoration of
Revamped the
Letter & Admonishments (L&A) section. The letters
were very many, and I have tried to find the best way possible to warn
Catholics of those who --- while they may be members of the Body of Christ ---
are publicly grievous sinners, heretics or schismatics.
I do not wish to needlessly disgrace them or pretend to take vengeance on them.
Nevertheless, I must make known their notorious & obstinate sins lest others
become harmed by them, too, in some terrible way.
I have therefore split the Admonishments into its own subsection, which can be
linked to immediately after entering L&A. Then, after a preface detailing
the correct way to rebuke a fellow Catholic, the surfer can follow whichever
link he wishes to investigate. There are four admonishments thus far (one of
which is brand new), with several more arriving by the end of this year, I
would expect.
Today is the Commemoration of St. Paul.
He tends to get swallowed up in the shadow of St. Peter. This is why the Church
separately commemorates him on this day, the day after June 29th,
which is the Feast of Ss. Peter & Paul together.
• The Feast of Ss. Peter & Paul, 2011 (6-29-11)
Updated the
First Things First section with a new article for those who consider themselves
Catholic. Like the original article that I had back in 2008 for those who
call themselves Christian or ‘born again’ before I updated it for a
new one, I thought the old article for self-styled Catholics to be a bit too lengthy
or rambly. It also failed to address the controversy
(amongst those few who purport to be truly Catholic during these horribly
apostate times, leastwise) of written abjurations. This new article tackles
that thorny beast head on. And if you think written abjurations are absolutely
necessary for the hope of salvation when a baptized soul abjures his
heresy, then you had best read this article now. You can link
to it directly here. You may be truly Catholic, my dear soul, but foolish
adherence to an ‘absolute necessity’ for written abjurations ---
especially during our apostate times --- reveals a tendency toward Catholic
fundamentalism (about which you may learn more here.)
I also updated the First Things First
section with an article for those who consider themselves some other form of
religion, or who lay claim to no religion at all… finally! This has been
waiting for three years. I think, though, that it is worth it. I had long ruminated
over what would be the best approach to such a person on a website like this.
While under no illusions --- this article will not,
apart from miraculous graces from God, convert hordes of non-Catholics to the
Catholic Faith --- the good-willed man who really wants to know the truth will
find it compelling. I know, because that’s how I am. Before I became
Catholic, I really did want to know the truth about things… particularly
the truth about our purpose in this existence. Such an article could have, at
the right moment, much shortened my journey out of the vain religions or
philosophies of this endarkened world. So if you are such a person, then please read it now.
You can link directly to it here.
I hope for more to come tomorrow. It is waiting in the wings,
almost ready to go.
Last but not least, the Feast of Ss. Peter & Paul is, in many
very real ways, the most important feast of the Catholic Church after the three
solemnities concerned with God. To wit, the Feasts of Easter,
Pentecost & Christmas. Only the Feast of the Immaculate Conception
(wherein Catholics honor the Mother of God as the only human being born without
sin in this world, aside from Her Divine Son, Jesus) is a possible rival to its
importance. This is because Peter & Paul founded the Church in
• The Solemnity of St. Joseph, 2011 (5-11-11)
Added my latest book, Catholic Fundamentalism: What It Is and Why It Is So Deadly,
to the Books & Articles section. While not exhaustive, this is my
definitive statement upon the subject for now. Who are Catholic
fundamentalists? Read the book to find out! It’s fairly short and not
that hard to get through.
In brief, though, Catholic
fundamentalists (CFs for short) are those who pretend
to know what the Magisterium is saying about a
particular topic even though the Magisterium is neither
explicit nor thorough about the topic in question. Indeed, even when --- at
least sometimes --- the Magisterium isn’t
addressing that particular issue at all!
The point is, CFs
like to see what isn’t actually there… and then pretend they
can’t possibly be wrong about it. This causes all sorts of problems, not
least of which is schism, heresy, and the unjust treatment of others as CFs accuse fellow Catholics of heresy where no heresy
exists, or where only a material heresy is involved. My dear reader, study this
book carefully to make sure that you aren’t a Catholic fundamentalist,
and, if not, to make certain you know how to defend yourself against these
pestilent troublemakers.
Incidentally, May 11th has not been called the Solemnity
of St. Joseph since 1955. However, it was observed as the Solemnity of St.
Joseph for centuries prior to the 20th century. Moreover, Pius XII
was a weakened and unvigilant pope by the mid-1950s. (Some accuse him of being
an antipope by then, but that’s another can of worms which I will deal
with later elsewhere.) It is therefore wiser, in my opinion, to keep the day as
it was previous to that date. In any case, a future pope can clear this up in
not-too-distant days to come. My own conscience meanwhile bids me to honor
Joseph in this fashion.
+
+ +
Pilate’s
query met:
Note:
if you’ve come
to this webpage directly from a search
engine or other
website, then, when done viewing this webpage
--- and assuming
you wish to view more of this website’s pages ---
please type the
website’s address (as given above right before this
note) into the
address bar at the top of your browser and hit the
‘enter’ button on the keyboard of your computer.
Please go here about use of the writings
on this website.
© 2015 by
Paul Doughton.
All rights
reserved.