+++ 43. The SEVENTH Devastating Argument:
+++
In Fatima Celestial Omens; 3 Secrets, the 3rd
Never Yet
Told; & a Solar Miracle for a New Age of the Son (Part 1)
Oddly, for the past 160
years, Catholics have treated the Modernist creation myth --- Darwinistic
macroevolution or ‘evo devo’
that we’ve talked about in some length within Chapters 38 & 39 ---
with a great deal of… how shall we say it? Well, understatement.
Or rather, we should say,
some skepticism & outcry came from Catholics during the late 1800s…
but not a whole lot. Turn-of-the-20th-century Catholics were even
more subdued, with their intellectuals positively starting to drool over
Darwinistic thought, and, by the middle of the 1900s, there was almost a mad
rush as Catholic people crowded onto the mutation express. Granted, the popes
were cautious, pointing out how Catholics must
profess the literal existence of Ss. Adam & Eve (after all, how could
the Church’s infallible teaching of Original Sin transpire if our first parents never
sinned as a consequence of having never
actually existed…?), still, no one seemed ‘overly’
enthusiastic about immunizing Roman Catholic minds since the mid-1800s.
Meanwhile, as Catholic
youngsters began to enroll at non-Catholic colleges
& universities in droves (or else
attended ‘catholic’ schools of higher education that, increasingly,
weren’t upholding Catholic dogma), there came to be less and less of a difference between
‘catholic’ people and non-Catholic people in
And by ‘West’, I
don’t just mean the western
A
hollowness that could not have occurred without moral & Darwinian dry rot.
Priests, theologians and
other Catholic intellectuals were already imbibing at the evolutionary fount
during the early 1900s. Other Catholics followed suit in greater numbers after
World War II. With both non-Catholic and ‘catholic’ colleges
teaching evo-devo by the 1970s, for the most part an
ostensible Catholic had no way to retain ‘catholicity’ with the rug
pulled out from under one’s feet. Why continue believing Catholicism was
infallibly true when contemporary scientists had ‘proved’
neo-Darwinian synthesis theory to be the ‘truth’ instead?
There’s no need for God. Nonetheless, if He does exist, He obviously
doesn’t supervise things closely.
Ergo, why go on believing in
a pointless religion? Or think it’s infallible?
Aside from cultural heritage
or aesthetic preference, why the charade?
And, if
‘catholic’, why not expect teaching
& practice to change?
A fallible
‘church’ has no right to tell you otherwise, right?
So
with
We should clearly align
ourselves with the Modern world & times!
And, truly, clergy &
laity were already aligning morally
(or, um… immorally).
The Church’s
opposition to Communism appeared to collapse, too, with the Vatican II
Pseudo-Council and post-Vatican II popes & antipopes. So, with a highly
communized globe (nations not formally
‘communist’ or ‘socialist’ being, notwithstanding,
influenced by the prevailing trends… consider, for instance, what
President Roosevelt’s ‘New Deal’ plan during the Great
Depression of the 1930s, or President Johnson’s ‘Great
Society’ programs of the welfare-minded 1960s, amounted to), why go
on looking toward any traditional religion, especially Catholicism, for
leadership? Aside from ‘social justice’ and cheerleading for the
New World Order, what has post-Vatican II ‘catholicity’ to offer?
We should ‘engage’ with the world, striving for a more
‘just’, fair & modern humanity. Priesthood, monasticism and
‘missions’ are passé. We no longer want to bother about
‘saving’ poor pagans, or anyone’s immortal soul. Proselytism
is nasty; priests, bishops & etc. answer to us; and monks or nuns are
simply ‘social workers’.
We need heaven on earth now.
A Heaven ‘only for good Catholics’ is ridiculous!
It is imperative we wind up being on the correct side of
evolutionary progress.
Of course, CNOs & TNOs can’t fully
get on board with this kind of change.
Yet they can’t fight
the rising tide, either. They’re like religious zombies.
And the wave of spiritual virus
inside them has too much sway over them.
+++ 44. The SEVENTH Devastating Argument:
+++
In Fatima Celestial Omens; 3 Secrets, the 3rd
Never Yet
Told; & a Solar Miracle for a New Age of the Son (Part 2)
A veneer of
‘orthodoxy’ was kept in place with both Vatican II and the
TNOs who believe in a very lengthy papal ‘inter
regnum’ are the most solid. This is because they are the least poisoned
by all these baleful influences. Sadly, they are still poisoned with salvation
heresy at a minimum, denying ‘no Salvation outside the Church’ to
mean what it has always meant in its original,
ancient, correct & narrow sense. This alone keeps them from
adequately grasping all the evil God has permitted to happen.
This is why the New World
Order’s New Aeon of the Sun has the upper hand.
There is almost no one left
who can systematically & powerfully resist them.
Most of all, we have no real
pope with spiritual authority to powerfully restrain satan.
In 1903 Pope Leo XIII passed
from this world. Pope Pius X succeeded him, and, after a brief but intense
fight against Modernism in the Church, he, as well, passed from this life in
1914. Pope Benedict XV (XV, not
XVI!) then took the helm of the Catholic Church. He immediately had to contend
with World War I. Near the end of this terrible conflict, Heaven chose to send
the Blessed Virgin Mary to earth again, in visible form to three children, this
time at Fatima in poor tiny
Their names were Lucia,
Francisco & Jacinta. And, while not saints as of then (to the extent we can
tell), they were certainly far better catechized & pious Catholic children
than were Melanie & Maximin at the time of Our
Lady of La Salette. With an angel’s help a year
earlier in 1916 and the Virgin Mary’s encouragement during six total
apparitions, these children became wonderful and fervent Roman Catholics.
Our Lady of Fatima appeared in 1917,
the year
That’s right. Just 25
days after the last Apparition of Fatima on 13 October 1917, the nation of
But more on that in just a
bit. By the way, revolution day was November 7th.
Our Lady’s first visit
to the children was on Sunday,
13 May 1917. For Catholics, this was significant in and of itself, Sunday long
traditionally associated with Her Son, Jesus, the God-Man, just as Saturday
has long linked to Her. (The connection is simple: Sunday the first day of Creation,
starting with God making the world, hence Her Son, God in the Flesh, honored
first of all with the creational day of first visit. And She, God’s
Mother, is honored next of all for being His Immaculate Mother.)
The date’s significant, too. In the universal liturgy of the Church (whether sanctoral or not), May 13 is a very historically
premiere moment of the year… before
the Feasts of the Immaculate Conception or the Glorious Assumption were
established in honor of the Blessed Virgin Mary… to laud Mary as
God’s Supreme Saint of All in the Church. Or, we ought to say, it’s
the date Boniface IV chose, in AD 610, as Supreme Pontiff of Christ’s
Catholic Church then, pagans having, the vast majority of them, converted to
Catholicism, to dedicate a former pagan temple --- the massive Pantheon, which honored all possible pagan deities, just in
case the pagans neglected to honor pagan gods elsewhere in the year, incurring
deistic displeasure --- to be a place of Catholic worship, honoring instead
the Blessed Virgin Mary and All the Martyrs, the martyrs paving the way for
this triumph by their blood. Regardless of a universality then (or perhaps not, the liturgical calendar
developing across the centuries in what is an acceptable understanding
of the term in ecclesial matters, i.e., to ‘develop’, as opposed to
the Modernist use of the term to wantonly promote the idea of infallible
doctrine ‘changing’ to mean something it never meant before
modern times) Pope St. Gregory VII then took Pope Boniface IV’s decision, transferring it’s commemoration
to November 1st (the Feast of All Hallows Day),
following the decision of Pope Gregory IV to fix All Saint’s Day on
November 1 universally as of AD 835. In this way we see the gradual shaping of
the universal liturgical calendar over the millennia. This is, within limits,
good & acceptable.
The point is,
the Pantheon and the honoring of the Virgin Mary as greatest of all
Heaven’s saints, transpired on May 13. Honoring all the ancient
martyrs as well, the symbolism is exquisite. A real & thoughtful Catholic
cannot possibly imagine Heaven is capricious about these matters --- that Heaven would choose this date out of nowhere, by sheer
chance. Hence, the selection of May 13 as Her First Apparition out of
six total of Our Lady of Fatima is significant, very significant. It is as much
as to say, “I, Queen of Highest Heaven, certified My Son’s Victory
over the City of Rome in the year AD 610, with the transformation of a former
pagan temple, the Pantheon [Greek for
‘all gods’], from being a temple for all false gods, into the Panangelon [Greek for
‘all angels’]. That is to say, it is now for the veneration of
All God’s Children in Heaven. As My Son said, and St. Paul His servant, the inhabitants of Heaven are like the
angels, neither male nor female in the same sense as they are on this
earth, which maleness & femaleness here below is for the procreation of
God’s Image; and so these heavenly denizens never give in fleshly
marriage or take in fleshly marriage. (Matthew 22:29-30, Mark 12:24-25, Luke
20:34-36 & Galatians 3:26-29) With My Holy Martyrs & Myself
honored this way, later extended to all
the saints whether martyred or not in the sense of their lives sacrificed
during bloody persecution, My Regal Victory was memorialized and declared
secure. Likewise, during the horrible rebellion you endure today, nearing the
turn of the third millennium, I will, despite hellish opposition, eventually
turn everything into a New Triumph for the Church,
My Son’s Body of Roman Catholicism. No luciferian opposition is a match
for
This is what Mary said to
any on earth who have ears to hear.
+++ 45. The SEVENTH Devastating Argument:
+++
In Fatima Celestial Omens; 3 Secrets, the 3rd
Never Yet
Told; & a Solar Miracle for a New Age of the Son (Part 3)
Our Creator usually has
Catholics suffer for their testing & purification.
Poor Lucia, Francisco &
Jacinta (the young seers of Our Lady of Fatima) certainly suffered mightily for
this privilege. Little Francisco and tiny Jacinta later died painfully, the
former at home and the latter at a distant hospital all alone, both at the
hands of the global plague of influenza spread worldwide in the aftermath of
World War I offering up everything they underwent for the appeasement of
God’s Just Wrath and the succoring of poor Catholic souls languishing in
Purgatory. Lucia, as well, who lived a much longer life, suffered terribly. Her
mother was particularly cruel at first, accusing her of lying about the
Apparition, and punishing her severely in order to get Lucia to admit it was
false. A thing Lucia never did, staunchly yet respectfully insisting upon the
truth --- that they’d seen a Beautiful Lady who asked them to come meet
Her under a holm oak tree in the often sere but
pastoral countryside, every 13th of the month. Many people
frequently associate the number 13 with misfortune & calamity. There is
some truth to this, though we cannot condone superstition. To wit, say, building
a hotel or tower and omitting thirteenth floors, or refusing to buy a ticket
for an auditorium seat that is number 13. These silly practices are what we
mean by ‘superstition’. Still, there is truth (read: Catholic
Truth!) to the idea of 13 connected to what is ominous or foreboding.
For instance --- to use but
one illustration --- Jesus Christ, the Second Person of Our Creator’s
Divine & Eternal Trinity, had His ‘Last Supper’ (for Catholics, the first Holy Mass) on
the eve of Good Friday, the day of His Passion & Crucifixion (the Gospel of St. John portrays it as Thursday
evening, which, for the Jews, meant Friday since their days began with sundown,
roughly six hours before the day beginning at midnight for we non-Jews
following ancient Roman custom… ergo why John was correct
to portray it, when non-Jews became the Church majority, as Thursday).
At this Eucharistic Paschal Supper, He gathered His Twelve Apostles, for a
total of thirteen in number.
Yet one of them, the ‘thirteenth’, as it were…
Judas Iscariot… was a traitor, selling Jesus for thirty pieces of silver.
The result was the aforementioned Passion & Crucifixion. This may be where
some ‘christianized’ cultures get the
Friday-the-13th superstition, since Friday is the moment He died on
the Cross, and, for Jews, it was a Passover full moon, being, calendrically, the 14th day of the first lunar
month of the religious year, Nisan. Signifying? That it is likely Judas made
his deal to betray Jesus on Nisan 13.
Accordingly, while a tad muddled, it could be the origin of Friday-the-13th.
Yet
whether likely or not, we are not
superstitious.
But we are allegorical. This
is because, spiritually speaking, God Himself is allegorical. We need
only peruse Sacred Scripture to see how allegorical God gets, or the early
Church fathers, to see how they delighted in finding allegory in the Bible. No
real & wise Catholic should be afraid of, or shun, religious allegory when
it plainly & logically upholds Catholicity or comes straight from
the pens of the Church fathers. Consequently, the number 13 is portentous.
It is a number of suffering, so to
speak, symbolizing trial & tribulation. In any case, that Our
Lady of Fatima chose to visit the children on the thirteenth day of May in 1917, telling them She would visit them upon the thirteenth day of every month following, until Her last
& final visit in October of 1917… is fascinating. In doing so, She
told any of Her children (read: Roman Catholics!) who would listen, that this
visit of Hers portended trial &
tribulation for God’s One True Church of Catholicism, Her
Son’s Singular Body, and for the world as a whole, which was in the midst
of World War I. It is also fascinating that Her Apparitions numbered six, so closely linked to
humanity and the Apocalyptic Beast. Moreover, to get mathematical, that 13 is
the sixth prime number, and,
too, a Fibonacci number sixth
in sequence from the starting point of zero or one.
And why would this curiosity
be notable? Is it a kind of ‘covert’ superstition?
Not
at all. I am not recommending superstitious
practices due to this number.
But Almighty God chose to form our creation in a certain way, and, of all
things in visible creation linked to Our Maker, mathematics is the one that is
most ‘purely connected’ to Him, in a very real sense. Thus, all
creation is a parable or allegory. One simply requires the
skills to ‘peruse it’. Mathematically, 13 and 6 reveal to us a
signal: this was Heaven’s way of foreshadowing the Betrayal & Crucifixion of the Ecclesial Body of the Son of Man, which Body is His
One & Only Roman Catholic Church, at the hands of impious, modernist human
beings, who would reject, profane & assault Our Maker’s Singular
Means of Salvation, thereby bringing upon modern humanity the Great Apostasy.
The Crucifixion is like the
‘13’ of tribulation, the ultimate trial, pain & price paid.
Because humanity, whose number is 6 more than any other number (like the integer of the Beast in Sacred
Scripture’s Apocalypse, which represents humanity as a whole in an
irrational & bestial Rebellion against God), the Great Apostasy is like
the ‘6’ of mutiny & revolution, the ultimate revolt, as it
were, against God. If you minus 6 from 13, what do you get? Correct
--- 7. More than any other numeral, 7 is the number of Our Creator, of
God. No human being escapes death. Every one of us will die. And we will, each
of us, either die with God or against Him. There’s no
in-between. With Him, as mere 6s, we’ve a chance to become like
Him, with Him, and fulfill our destiny of being Him, forever, in
the Beatific Vision… inasmuch
as any mere creature could ‘be’ God. Whereas,
without him, as mere 6s, we will never achieve sevenhood.
We grasp, decimally clutching & scratching, like intelligent yet foolish
animals, untamed, ludicrously thinking ourselves able to bear the weight of
divinity without Him. Meanwhile, 7 became 6 --- Jesus Christ --- and
paved the way for us to Heaven, we climbing the Ladder of St. Jacob, His One
& Only Roman Catholic Religion, merged baptismally with His Body, the
Catholic Church, which is how we may ascend. Viz., seven became
six so that six may become seven, via thirteen, evading hell forever.
This is further prefigured
inasmuch as, during the THIRD apparition of Our Lady of
Fatima, upon 13 July 1917, the Mother of God gave the three children a
petrifying vision of hell at the heart of the earth. Per Lucia, had this vision
went for more than the briefest second, watching the damned souls of human
beings tormented in an eternal prison, they would have died immediately from horror
& grief. For just as Christ descended into the heart of the earth until the
THIRD
& ultimate day --- so as to make
possible redemption for those human souls who are not yet Catholic; or, if
Catholic, not presently in the state of grace; as well as to relieve Catholic
souls who died in the state of grace but are now suffering in Purgatory (the
temporary part of hell where these Catholic souls, dying in the state of grace,
are made perfect) --- so, too, His Ecclesial Body now dies on the Cross,
cleansing the Church of impenitent members and their damnable trespasses,
opening the way for a new Pentecost and final phase of human beings’
conversion, allowing them to become Catholic before it is too late, and
assisting poor souls in Purgatory with merciful Roman Catholic prayers…
till the THIRD day arrives.
+++ 46. The SEVENTH Devastating Argument:
+++
In Fatima Celestial Omens; 3 Secrets, the 3rd
Never Yet
Told; & a Solar Miracle for a New Age of the Son (Part 4)
Nor does the story of three end there. For in the Apparitions of Fatima we unveil a
plethora of threes. Three children were witnesses of these Celestial
Visitations. Ever wonder why? Probably not.
Nevertheless, a lack of curiosity --- or failure of imagination upon our part
--- does not ‘prove’ the symbolism is missing. Heaven wove three
into the event even if we are ignorant or dismissive. Humanity is tripartite
in many ways. The Catholic Church is tripartite (Militant, Suffering & Triumphant) and the messages imparted to
the children in the wake of the hellish vision are tripartite, too.
Which
leads one to ask, “So what is the tripartite
Message of Fatima?”
Few people ever wonder about
this. Indeed, few people know much about
Strange? I suppose. Inexplicable?
Maybe. Impossible? God will
be the judge.
In any case, immediately
after showing the Fatima children the appalling vision of hell on 13 July 1917,
Our Lady of Fatima then revealed three crucial ‘secrets’ as well.
What we are about to read constitutes the initial part of EXHIBIT NO. 15. Here is the first:
“YOU HAVE SEEN HELL, where the souls of poor sinners go.
To save them, God wishes to establish in
the world DEVOTION TO MY IMMACULATE HEART. If what I say to you is
done, many souls will be saved and there will be peace.”
In this simple statement is
laid bare a pair of very simple truths. One, that hell actually
exists. This is not a popular opinion amongst modern people, to say the
least. Yet it is a truth that the Catholic Church infallibly upholds
and which, as members of the Church have gone further & further into
apostasy (thereby losing their
Catholicity), they have denied. Some have been blatant, denying hell
altogether. Some are a bit more subtle, pretending Christ saves
‘everyone’ from hell, whether or not they die professing the Catholic
Faith whole & entire. (This is the
heresy of ‘universalism’, by the way, which both Antipopes John
Paul II & Francis have publically espoused, something that is no shock if
you fathom our zeitgeist.) Others are yet more subtle, saying hell is only a
non-physical ‘state of being’ (whatever,
exactly, that means!), devoid of real fire and literal pain of the senses.
These falsehoods are each of them damnable --- as in, God’s Church
has explicitly condemned them, and you will languish in the real torment
of hell forever, having denied its reality in any way, shape or form. Two, that God’s intent in this place &
time… the situation of a world in apostasy, including people who
are supposed to be His, calling themselves ‘roman catholic’…
is to combat His enemy, Lucifer, with the devil’s premiere
object of hatred. And this recipient
of satan’s hatred
is…? The creature who is what Lucifer was supposed to be ---
the Blessed Ever-Virgin Mary,
the Light Bearer. And, while God never intended Lucifer to bear the Second
Person of the Almighty, notwithstanding, this is precisely what He has
intended Mary to be… the Bearer
of Light… of God Himself.
Whereby it is also God’s Will, as made known to us via the Apparitions of
Fatima, that He has determined, both logically & additionally, that it is
through Devotion to Her Immaculate
& Sorrowful Heart that He will accomplish an even greater
salvation during our times, when hellacious anti-Catholic evil is
completely rampant and brazenly defiant toward the Law of Natural Reason. A
resurrection of His One True Church and salvation of otherwise lost souls that
is, humanly speaking, so improbable (presume
the unbelieving…) and so Roman Catholic that nobody can
intelligently deny that such a thing is God’s Supernatural Miracle.
Notice,
too, the conditional statement upon which we closed the quote above. The Beautiful Lady, God’s Mother, said
much else that we will examine soon; nonetheless, She
prefaced it with, “If what I
say to you is done…” Not ‘surely’, or ‘for
certain’, but, “If…” And
these “many souls” will indeed “be saved” …yet only IF what She says is accomplished. A sobering thought! And, while we’ve
not quoted it yet, She made a promise. Which is? That
the war
“The war is going to
end [this is where Our Lady assures the
children, and all who acknowledge their testimony, that World War I would come
to an end, neither soon nor too long from then], but if people do not cease offending God, a worse one will
break out during the reign of Pius XI [this
was the second prophecy Our Lady gave to the children, no one then knowing
that the very next pope, after the then presently ruling Benedict XV, would
be Pius XI and begin his reign in 1922, five years from that point in time,
1917]. When you see a night illumined
by an unknown light, know that this is the great sign given you by
God that He is about to punish the world for its crimes [vile immorality and rabidly anti-Catholic
hatred], by means of war, famine and PERSECUTIONS OF THE CHURCH AND THE
HOLY FATHER.”
What was this second &
worse conflict on the dark horizon?
World
War II. Perhaps
you’ve heard of it.
The ‘War to End All
Wars’ (World War I) did nothing
of the sort, and its noble appearing, yet ultimately pathetic, attempt at
global peace for the New World Order --- the League of Nations --- failed
miserably, especially when the increasingly dominating United States of
America, whose former president, Woodrow Wilson, played a huge role in putting
it together, bailed on it. The chaotic & crushing aftermath of World War I
left Europe adrift under the baleful influence of various kinds of communists,
socialists & nationalists (one of the
latter, a Serbian foe of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, sadly igniting World War
I with the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand in the Balkan Peninsula…).
Ironically, newly arisen fascists, such as Mussolini & Hitler, aped
Communistic amoral brutality --- ‘the end justifies the means’ ---
whilst detesting Socialistic propaganda & aims (particularly ‘Il Duce’ Mussolini, who once eagerly
promoted Socialism, but became disenchanted and, with Italian ‘national
socialism’, inspired Hitler with his version of ‘Nationalsozialismus’,
to wit, the German ‘Nazis’).
The “night illumined by an unknown light”,
incidentally, was 25 January 1938, when, per astronomers, an ‘aurora
borealis’ of unprecedented size, color & intensity was visible all
over Europe, even to the astonishingly lower northern latitudes of north
Africa. It may indeed have been solely or primarily what our scientists now
call an ‘aurora borealis’… although this is immaterial for a
wise Catholic since, in knowing that God controls all things, natural or
supernatural, then applying the label of a ‘natural phenomenon’ to
events of this kind in no way makes it less amazing, striking or never a sign
utilized by God to communicate something important to little human beings on
the earth. In reality, however, it is not at all ‘proven’ ---
simply by applying a multisyllabic label to a thing --- that you either truly
& fully understand, or have really explained (away) that thing… in
this case, something we have lately called an ‘aurora’. Yet whether
it was ‘merely’ an aurora or not, it was so spectacular and
alarming that people thought the far distant mountains were on fire. The colors
were nothing short of flabbergasting, turning rubescent, as if the entire sky
were bathed in blood. Getting the picture?
Historians generally agree
that World War II officially began with Nazi Germany’s blitzkrieg attack
against
World War II finished ---
the militarily violent part, leastwise --- Soviet Russia everywhere pressed its
advantage in eastern Europe, establishing the Soviet
bloc countries, Communist China arising by 1949 and exerting influence in east
Asia in a similar fashion. Many, many Catholics died under the hardline Communist regimes, with some scholars estimating
there were more martyrs during the 20th century than martyrs of the
first three centuries combined. In open form, Communism at its height ruled one
half of humanity (today it is still a
third of the world’s population, the other thirds heavily communized or
socialized). Communists also nearly won dominant control in
Tragically,
not to be.
Twilight came, and a secret draped in shadows. You see, Our Lady of Fatima said
a few other things in the second part of Her Message, which we quote here as a
continuation of EXHIBIT NO. 15
in this controversial book, Inter Regnum:
“To prevent this [the aforementioned punishment of the world,
with war, famine & persecution against the Church], I will come to ask
for the consecration of
This is where it gets
extremely ‘controversial’, making the Apparitions of Our Lady of
Fatima practically as disputed & despised as the
‘controversial’ Apparition of Our Lady of La Salette.
Intriguingly, both Apparitions --- and their Messages --- aroused fierce
opposition, condemnation, irrationality, misrepresentation and outright lies.
What’s going on? Why
the abhorrence of these supernatural things?
Like
we noted before, when this kind of reaction occurs, it generally indicates one
of two possibilities. Either, one, the thing disputed & controverted is extremely
deadly & evil; or else, two, the thing disputed & controverted is extremely helpful & salutary. Yet highest
ecclesial authority (the Papacy and those
of the Hierarchy entrusted with investigating
So what’s the problem?
Again, in a nutshell --- Fatima’s
Message.
+++ 47. The SEVENTH Devastating Argument:
+++
In Fatima Celestial Omens; 3 Secrets, the 3rd
Never Yet
Told; & a Solar Miracle for a New Age of the Son (Part 5)
True, it’s also
mindless & luciferian hatred against the supernatural & miracles.
The powers-that-be, especially as the New World Order (read: those who are against the Old World Order of Roman
Catholicism and Catholic nations) spreads its tentacles into
more & more of our human lives, most certainly do not want people
believing in miracles & the supernatural, since this leads in the direction
opposite of that toward which they desire to go --- meaning, toward disbelief in and disobedience to
God’s Religion.
Notwithstanding, this part
of the Fatima Message is where it gets poignant. For what country did the
Virgin Mary mention specifically? Right,
Which
is precisely what has occurred to the human race for the past century.
The ‘good’ would
be martyred as well, She warned. To wit, actual Roman
Catholics would either die or else suffer terribly for the True Faith. The
pope, too, would suffer greatly, with various nations
‘annihilated’. That is to say, not necessarily
destroyed with ‘natural catastrophes’. But
no longer existing as separate or sovereign people, free to rule themselves as
they see fit. Which, additionally, is also precisely
what has occurred during the past century. (E.g., think of the Soviet bloc countries, or Mongolia or Tibet, or
nations still struggling to hang on to Catholicity, yet, ultimately, unable to
preserve their ancient identity, like Spain or Ireland, and so forth and so on)
All of these things have happened for a single reason: because Modernists detest
Roman Catholicism and an Old World Order, yearning for anti-Catholicism and
a
Bringing us to the third
part of
“In the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph. The
Holy Father will consecrate
Leading us to ask,
“What is this ‘dogma of
the Faith’ that will ‘always
be preserved’ within ‘Portugal’
(and why in the world is it to be preserved in Portugal, very
plainly implying that in most of the world, if not
the whole of earth!, THIS DOGMA WILL BE LOST?!?);
and when is ‘the end’,
wherein the Blessed Virgin Mary’s ‘Immaculate
Heart will triumph’, a true & good Bishop of Rome finally
obeying Her Regal Will in regards to the Consecration
of Russia --- and Russia alone! --- to the Celestial Essence of Her Sword-Pierced Soul, thereby CONVERTING
THEM TO CATHOLICISM?”
No one has been looking for
the answers. This is because no one has even thought to ask the right
questions. We’ve shuffled along like old, decrepit men pretending to be
young, acting as if debauched memory is the same as one’s present
reality, and as if the fantasy of carnal existence will never melt like a
dream, the dying man gasping & waking, a pillar of pain scorching his dry
soul like summer fire on the prairie, finding himself wandering in a hall of
mirrors, everywhere staring at his burning reflection… the existence he
thought was so priceless… and each face he sees is uglier and more monstrous
and more demonic than the last. Is he a human being anymore? Is our humanity
human any longer? Or has the Apocalyptic Beast sank its teeth into our bleeding
flesh, leaving a mark like an eternal scar, empty eyes forever imagining a
banquet we’ll never taste, having devoured our own flesh in an orgy of
appetite, becoming a living nothingness, wailing in rage, starving, immortal
& ravenous.
But if, dear reader, you
don’t want to be an immortal beast, either happily… or else in
trepidation… receiving the luciferian character upon your mind and upon
your will, then stop, take a deep breath, and consider the repercussions. The
Message that
Who will join me at the
Celestial Door? God is looking for eager acolytes.
Sister Lucia’s superiors
did not command her to record the 3rd Secret until
1943. She suffered a malicious illness, nearly dying, and her diocesan bishop,
His Excellency da Silva (who was mortally afraid of knowing its content, fearing the
responsibility & terror it might inflict upon him), finally gave her a
solemn order, the very thing Lucia had long been waiting for, not daring to
write such a momentous thing without highest authority backing her up. It then took another several months,
as Heaven allowed the devil to supernaturally hinder her. Do you understand, dear soul? This is something hell’s
Luciferian Dragon very badly did NOT
want Lucia writing down so that fellow Christians of the Singular Roman Faith
might LEARN Our Lady’s
Purpose.
Intrigued? You ought to be.
If not, then you’re mired in a religious stupor.
It took an Apparition of Our
Lady of Fatima in Sr. Lucia’s infirmary on 2 January 1944, dispelling all
diabolic opposition and doubts or concerns in the seer’s mind, for the
Third of Fatima’s Tripartite Message to be written down by her hand.
Luckily, the testimony of Bp. Venancio --- who was
the auxiliary bishop of José Alves Correida da Silva, long time
Archbishop of Leiria, Portugal (in which diocese the tiny town of Fatima lay), seized the
opportunity to examine this secret inasmuch as he could before it departed from
the care of Abp. da Silva (as remarked above, Abp. da Silva was
mortally afraid to know details of Fatima’s Third Secret, leaving it
unopened --- and even though he had a permission, nay, perhaps the heavenly
responsibility! --- to open it and publish it publically at the proper time).
Meaning, Bp. Venancio did not dare to unseal the
Secret, which he had never received authorization to see, but, after
languishing unopened in the diocesan archives till 1957, the Vatican then
ordering it to be transferred to Rome, our most intrepid bishop briefly held
Lucia’s Secret, kept as it was in a small envelope and securely sealed
inside an even larger envelope, in front of a bright light, carefully observing
that it was on a small & single sheet of paper, from 20 to 25 lines long.
In other words, this
earthshaking Message was very short and very succinct. Which
automatically rules out, then, any claimed ‘revelations’ of the
Third Secret of Fatima that are too lengthy or too wordy. What could this extremely brief Message
possibly tell us?
One important clue is Sr.
Lucia’s explicit instructions to Abp. da Silva.
She, in turn, received these instructions from Heaven, of course. Upon learning
that His Eminence would not read the secret himself, Lucia gained from the
Archbishop his promise that he would have the Third Secret opened and revealed
to the world either at her death, or else in 1960, whichever came first. Why in 1960? A very powerful man in the Vatican at the time, Cd. Ottaviani, personally asked
Sister Lucia, in 1955, why Our Lady’s Message was not to be revealed to
the Roman Catholic Church prior to 1960. This is part of EXHIBIT NO. 15, too, and to him she in 1955 replied:
“…because it
will SEEM CLEARER.”
She also added:
“…because the
Blessed Virgin WISHES IT SO.”
Getting this, my tender
reader? Something about the Fatima Message would be easier to comprehend by 1960. And it was Heaven’s
Express Will that the Third Secret be publicly revealed to the full Catholic
Church all over the world by this exact
& critical date.
Yet are you troubled &
beset, or skeptical & reluctant? Why should we put such trust in
Lucia’s words, you might protest, as if she is inerrantly prophetic, a
veritable Mouthpiece of God and Herald of Our Lady? This may seem a reasonable
concern, although it bears noting how it appears to fly in the face of highest
authority in the Church, who gave solemn approval to devotion to Our Lady of
Fatima, and, as a result, why approve
Apparitions for no other purpose than to ‘honor’ God’s
Mother… and when, in fact, Heaven plainly & inarguably sent Her
for a Purpose greater than mere ‘honor’? To wit, when it
was plainly & inarguably God’s Will that She deliver us a Message
that was, it is obvious, intended --- ultimately --- for everyone in the Church to know, to believe, to esteem, and
to obey, thereby fulfilling the
supreme & true Purpose of Fatima?
Yet we are forgetting
something. What might that something be?
That God Himself chose to
seal the truth & importance of Our Lady of Fatima with, indisputably, the
Greatest Miracle performed on earth since Apostolic Times. Namely,
the Great Miracle of the Sun on 13 October 1917 in
Heaven does not perform miracles for no
reason --- especially a sign & prodigy this fantastic.
As Our Lord’s Beloved Disciple said, concerning His Miracles while on
earth in
Understand now why Heaven
does miracles? It’s not to amuse or entertain.
It’s a big, giant sign
to say, “This is important. Take it seriously.”
Nor is
Whether absolutely &
thoroughly accurate or not, it does have some merit.
Such
as? Well,
consider my own case. Did I see the Fatima Miracle?
No, I didn’t. Aside
from my Catholicity, then, why believe in it?
Because lots of people did see it, with their very own
eyes.
For instance, I have a
Catholic friend near to where I live. He’s around 60 years of age as I
write and is of Portuguese heritage. He in turn had an elderly Portuguese
relative, who he personally knew, who had witnessed the Miracle of the Sun at
Fatima in
Period, end of sentence
and… case of the Miracle of the Sun summarily closed.
You have free will, of
course, dear reader. If resolutely
determined due to prejudice… and despite all this indubitable, massive testimony to the
contrary, and without having witnessed the event with your own eyes, either confirming or disconfirming it,
then, out of the thin air,
with no personal eyewitness evidence of your own… yes, you can choose to disbelieve, dearest
one, yet you are irrational.
You are not an omniscient
(all-knowing) or an infallible (never-wrong) creature, and, should you choose to believe in the
religious philosophies of Naturalism
or Materialism (viz., nature
or matter are all that exist, there is
no ‘supernatural’), then you are --- however smart
otherwise --- an idiot. I beg
your pardon for insulting you, but the
epithet is both true & necessary, requiring me, in complete honesty, to point it
out. I could no more intelligently ‘play along’ with neighbors pretending their house is not on fire
and that they’re in no danger.
Disregarding imminent, agonizing, fiery death… is this not tragic idiocy?
One may not be able to ‘force’ them out of their
burning home --- yet must one say nothing so as not to
‘hurt’ their feelings, is not one justified in calling a
spade a spade, cannot candid truth be the most compassionate & sensible
thing in this extreme (and extremely deadly!) situation? To imagine
otherwise truly is the idiocy of an idiot.
Remember
‘solipsism’? And ‘logic’? Ah,
then. We can fathom the fathomable.
Miracles are NOT ‘unfathomable’;
we thus need say no more about STUPIDITY.
The
gist? Heaven has
more than authenticated Our Lady of
In a word, the Third Secret
of the tripartite Fatima Message is crucial to our era, overwhelmingly critical
to the salvation of immortal souls during the Great Apostasy when the vast
majority of human beings are headed to an everlasting hell, and devastatingly pertinent
to the anti-Catholic antipopes that we endure.
Yet what is the
Message, its apocalyptic &
bestial import?
+++ 48. The SEVENTH Devastating Argument:
+++
In Fatima Celestial Omens; 3 Secrets, the 3rd
Never Yet
Told; & a Solar Miracle for a New Age of the Son (Part 6)
The key lies in the
mysteriously truncated sentence that we quoted near the start of Chapter
47 in this book, Inter Regnum. Do you
recall? “In
Serious scholars of
“…the dogma… preserved…” and an “etc.”
are indeed the THIRD SECRET.
You see, the Archbishop of Leiria, His Excellency da Silva,
four times commanded Lucia, during the 1930s & ’40s, to write down an
account of what she and Francisco & Jacinta saw and did, concerning all of
the words & events of the Apparitions of Fatima, including the visits from
an angel that the children experienced in 1916, in preparation for the Six
Apparitions of the Blessed Virgin Mary in 1917. In the first three accounts
Lucia gave many details, some of it paralleling what she had already reported.
In the fourth account, however, she curiously added the details above. This
then led the Hierarchy to be aware enough of the 3rd Secret to thus
request its full contents.
As remarked above, this was
accomplished in 1944, against hellish opposition. Archbishop da Silva being afraid of what the Third Secret contained (a fear with which we may sympathize,
whatever his faults in the matter, since the 2nd Secret foretold the
horrendous World War II with its horrifying consequences…), he let
the Message sit unopened until the Vatican ordered it --- and other documents
related to Fatima ---transferred to Rome in 1957. An unfortunate decision, for
with Sr. Lucia managing to gain Abp. da Silva’s
promise that he would open the Third Secret and reveal it to the world
either when Lucia died or by 1960 at latest --- whichever came first ---
it then sealed the fate of Fatima’s
Message for some time. Ironically, da Silva
himself, in foreseeing his imminent demise, ordered the Message transferred to
the Bishop of Lisbon, Portugal’s Patriarch, should da
Silva die prior to Lucia’s death or 1960.
In the meantime, as devotion
to Our Lady of Fatima spread throughout the Catholic Church and knowledge of
the 3rd Secret also spread, the Hierarchy assuring Catholics how the
Blessed Virgin Mary had instructed Sr. Lucia that it should be revealed to the
world by 1960, there was growing excitement as the date neared. What did the Secret contain? What
would it say? And then a strange thing happened. Pius XII (who was popularly known as ‘the Pope
of Fatima’ due to his very great devotion to Our Lady of Fatima, not to
mention the fact that he was consecrated as a bishop on 13 May 1917, the
day of the 1st Apparition of Fatima in Portugal, at the hands
of Pope Benedict XV, who ruled the Church in 1917, the year of Fatima)
died in 1958 and, against expectations, rotund and ‘jovial’ John
XXIII replaced him on 28 October 1958. 11 ballots at the conclave had been
unable to make a ⅔ majority for any candidate and, from a ‘conservative’
point of view, John XXIII was seen as a
‘compromise’ pope and brief ‘caretaker’ of the Papacy
at the age of 76. This is why he stunned the world when, on 25 January 1959, he
announced he was going to convene an ecumenical council --- shocking his
Vatican Curia, who had no warning this was going to occur (this was unusual in that, normally, a pope gives the Curia plenty of
time to prepare for such a massive & grave event) --- and, later, when
asked why he was doing so, he apparently replied, with theatricality literally
throwing open a nearby window, “I want to throw open the windows of the
Church so that we can see out and the people can see in.” He also, in his
inaugural speech as the world’s Catholic bishops convened at
Notice, precious reader, how
there is nothing about salvation of souls? Granted, in his speech John XXIII
once says the word “save” and twice says the word
“salvation”. All the same, he never once makes it clear that there
is, most literally, ‘no Salvation
outside the Church’, and that this infallible dogma is the raison d’être [‘reason
for’ the Catholic Church ‘to exist’] of Jesus’
Ecclesial Body, beyond any other purpose we may invoke… and yet
the Church’s Hierarchy has always upheld one’s eternal
salvation as the cardinal purpose of God’s Singularly Roman
Catholic Church. Notice, too, how John XXIII dares to disrespect ---
without actually naming them --- his own predecessors on the Throne of St.
Peter, particularly Pius IX, Leo XIII & Pius X, who very much, as we have
seen, saw that the world was getting worse & worse, threatening humanity
with, first, a Deluge of Heresy & Immorality, and, secondly, a Flood of
God’s Utterly Just Wrath toward those who never bother to seek His
Singular Religion, or who, being raised ‘catholic’, have almost no
interest in saving their immortal souls with either the ordinary means of
Christ’s Sacraments, or else extraordinary ones like the Apparitions of
Fatima.
Mind you, I don’t dare
to call Pope John XXIII a notorious & pertinacious heretic, consequently
automatically excommunicated and no longer truly the pope. As far as I’m
able to tell, he never went that far in public, or in private, in a way that is
based on the morally certain testimony of human beings who knew & served
him. But I definitely suspect him of ‘occult’ (that is,
‘hidden’) heresy, and it wouldn’t surprise me at all, looking
toward the not-too-distant future, if a wise & legitimate pope had him
investigated thoroughly and condemned & deposed as an Enemy of Christ.
After all, Pope Formosus’ corpse was exhumed and the pope of the time
vehemently condemned him (perhaps overly dramatic and not done wisely or
rightly… but done it was, six years after his death, in AD 897), and Pope
Honorius I, who died in AD 638, suffered condemnation at the 3rd
Council of Constantinople in 680, confirmed by his successor, Pope Leo II
(although, to be fair, they condemned him for ‘negligence’
regarding the Monothelite Heresy, and not that he
himself espoused it).
How difficult is it to believe that a future holy pope might do something
similar when it comes to Popes John XXIII & Paul VI, who, the two of them,
began, plotted & deployed the wicked Pseudo-Council of Vatican II upon
Catholics and the whole earth, Paul VI additionally losing both his Catholicity
and his Papacy for publicly promulgating documents, that notoriously &
pertinaciously teach heresy, on 8 December 1965?
Please see
Helplessly Ignorant in the Books &
Articles section and
For Those Who Consider Themselves Catholic
in the First Things First section for hard
proof, logic & documentation for these grave charges against Vatican II and
Paul VI. The 16 documents of Vatican II contain many explicit problems in the
external forum, but, like the Arian Heresy of old (which stole up to 90% of the Church’s membership from its Ark at
the height of its power during the fourth century, both leaders & laity)
denied Our Lord’s Incarnation
as God from All of Eternity, so, too, does the Modernist Heresy of new (which has stolen essentially all of the
Church’s membership from its Ark after an execrable Vatican II, both
leaders & laity) deny Our Lord’s Ecclesiation as
God’s Singularly Roman Catholic Church since the Holy Ghost’s
Descent at Pentecost. Whichever, both heresies strike at an Infallible Dogma
that is crucial to Christ’s Heavenly Catholic Body’s
This denial
of the absolute & visible necessity of Christ’s Ecclesial Body
to our everlasting salvation --- ‘no Salvation outside the
Church’ in its original, ancient, strict, correct & unchanging sense
--- is the Central Heresy of the Great Apostasy. It is the Lie of
‘salvation-through-ignorance-and-sincerity’. Again, you may
find all the hard proof and relentless documentation needed (if skeptical) in,
for instance, the Helplessly Ignorant
book. In short, howsoever, Vatican II briefly yet explicitly taught Salvation
Heresy thrice in their documents, Lumen
gentium, Paragraphs 14 & 16, and Ad gentes,
Paragraph 7. Like a threefold denial of Christ all over again, St.
Peter’s Successor at that time, Paul VI, denied Jesus Christ & His Roman Catholic Religion Whole
& Undefiled, and the world’s assembled bishops, as far as I
can tell, blinked not an eye. Accordingly, while a
tiny few bishops voted against some of the 16 documents of Vatican II here or
there, or, at least, refused to vote one way or another… none of them,
insofar as I can determine, voted against any of these sixteen documents
because of notorious & pertinacious heresy, least of all because of Salvation Heresy. Vatican II
was commandeered early on by liberal northern Europe bishops centered around the
You savvy? This is “the dogma of the
Faith” denied. It’s why we’re astray.
And why did Our Lady of
Fatima tell Sister Lucia that, “In Portugal, the dogma of the Faith will
always be preserved etc.”? Because, with the
Apparitions of the Virgin Mary and the Miracle of the Sun came a renewal of
fervency in the hearts of most Portuguese. The hierarchy, too, the
bishops of
Yet what does the
“etc.” mean? Serious & pious
It was Lucia’s way of
hinting there’s a 3rd Secret of Fatima to come, without
revealing the every detail of its contents before the right time. And all the
serious & pious
So
why 1960?
Why would Our Lady tell Lucia that’s the time to release it?
Because Pope John XXIII had
just announced, to the shock of everyone, that he was invoking a council.
Remember, in January of 1959, just months after his election? Thus, if the
Third Secret warned about Global Apostasy and the holding of a bad council,
with apostasy coming from the very top… well, then, how likely do you
think that it was any of the proponents of this unexpected council wanted the
Fatima Message published all over the world? It would put a terrible kink in
their plans. It would also reveal them to be the enemies of the True Faith they
were, indicting themselves in the process. Do you get it? As
one cardinal back then remarked (and I paraphrase roughly), “If the
Message was good, then it would have been released. Therefore, the
Message must be bad.” Exactly. And so 1960 came,
the Catholic world holding its collective breath… and nothing. A terse statement from the
This had to have come from
John XXIII himself. Everything indicates that, while Pius XII had the 3rd
Secret available to him in the
We’ve incontestable
proof from the testimony of Sister Lucia.
+++ 49. The SEVENTH Devastating Argument:
+++
In Fatima Celestial Omens; 3 Secrets, the 3rd
Never Yet
Told; & a Solar Miracle for a New Age of the Son (Part 7)
You see, poor soul, while at
a nunnery in
He did not. He was ensconced
in ‘ostpolitik’ (‘east
politics’), trying diplomatically to establish relations with the newly
Communist
Too late Pius XI learned
this lesson, finally condemning Communism in blistering language in 1937. (See
his papal encyclical, Divini redemptoris,
published on March 19 that very year, for proof of this. In it he calls “bolshevistic and atheistic Communism… a system
full of errors and sophisms.” He warns that it “subverts
the social order, because it means the destruction of its foundations…”
In a shrewd observation that infuriates people today since it is the very thing
that has become the new ‘normal’, especially in our most modernized
part of earth, Pius XI asserts, “Communism is particularly characterized
by the rejection of any link that
binds woman to the family and the home, and her emancipation is
proclaimed as a basic principle. She is withdrawn from the family and
the care of her children, to be thrust instead into public life and collective
production [read: making money by
working outside the home] under the same conditions as man. The care of
home and children then devolves upon the collectivity [read: modern society as a whole, as ruled
by a Modernist government]. Finally, the right of education is denied to
parents, for it is conceived as the exclusive prerogative of the
community [read: those who lead the
Modernist society], in whose name and by whose mandate alone parents
may exercise this right.” This, by the way, is why modern nations have introduced compulsory public education & schools everywhere around
the world in the last one hundred sixty years. Pope Pius XI also observes,
“In a word, the Communists claim to
inaugurate a NEW era and a NEW civilization which is the result of blind
evolutionary forces culminating in a humanity WITHOUT
God.” One may find these quotes in the encyclical in
Paragraphs 14, 11 & 12, respectively.) Notwithstanding, despite all the
wonderful, stirring, militant and very true words in Divini redemptoris, Pius XI still refused to consecrate the
nation of Russia & her people to the Immaculate Heart. Perhaps he thought
it would be just too ‘infuriating’ to the Communists, causing
persecution run amuck. On the other hand… he’s already pretty
severe above.
So what’s the problem?
It’s hard not to suspect evil machinations in the
Higher hopes came with Pope
Pius XII, the ‘Pope of Fatima’. And, to be honest, he did
consecrate the earth to Mary’s Immaculate Heart, publicly, in 1942. Yet
he didn’t tell his
bishops to join him in this act, at the same time on the same day, and, while
Lucia said it was pleasing to Our Lord & Lady, causing World War II to end
sooner, she also bluntly reminded anyone who would listen that this was still NOT what the King & Queen of
Highest Heaven had commanded. They still awaited consecration of poor
Russia.
Which
leads us to give the reader another portion of EXHIBIT NO. 15.
For in a letter of 29 August 1931, Sr. Lucia reported Our Lord’s sobering
words to her diocesan bishop.
“Make it known to My ministers [priests, bishops & pope] that given
they follow the example of the King of
Phew! Did you get that, beloved reader? A simple,
blunt & scary warning:
“…given they follow the
example of the KING OF
Do you know what happened to the Kings of France,
my dearest & beloved reader?
The Apostle of Devotion to the Sacred Heart of
Jesus, St. Margaret Mary Alacoque in
Rebellious & dangerous Freemasons were
spreading throughout France, Protestants had nearly overcome the nation during
the 1500s & 1600s (the
‘Huguenots’), only just barely repelled by a combination of saints
reconverting some of them & military battles killing, exiling or containing
the others, and the Endarkenment [Enlightenment] took obstinate root amongst French intellectuals
and many of the powerful nobility during the 1700s. This, together with economic
misery, government folly in certain policies of taxation, etc., waning grain
harvests, an endless parade of pamphlets mocking ‘old order’
leaders of the ‘ancien regime’ (read: Catholic royalty & orthodox
bishops or priests) and upping the latest political or philosophical
modernist thinking (pamphlets were sort
of the ‘social media’ of the day, spreading ideas, memes &
‘fake news’), the French people --- specially in the more
urbanized areas, like Paris --- were ripe for Revolution. The Storming of the Bastille
on 14 July 1789 began the violence in earnest (I’d the eerie spectacle of a nigh well empty Paris on Sunday, 15
July 1989, flying in and bicycling through the City of Lights on wide, barren
& beautiful boulevards exactly 2 centuries and 1 day after the murderous
event, Parisians exhausted in the wake of nonstop celebration, holidays &
Sabbath quietude, my self neither yet Catholic nor yet wholly aware of how the
French Revolution began), and, guess what? 100 years after Our Lord’s Request via the saintly Visitation
nun, Margaret Mary Alacoque, that the King of France
publicly, formally and officially consecrate his nation to the Sacred &
Suffering Heart of Jesus Christ, the king and his poor regal family, faced with
a crowd of 7000 women angry at having too little bread to feed their families,
armed with cannon or smaller weapons, and blaming king and officials for their
plight, as well as demanding that he be in Paris (instead of the Palace of Versailles, barely some five miles from the
center of Paris…), under the ‘protection’ of the National
Guards were forcibly taken to the Parisian palace of Tuileries,
where, noted King Louis XVI, he & family were mere prisoners.
Chance? I think not. God can choose whatever time He
sees fit, but, in this case, He granted the French Monarchy a century to obey His Will. Later,
in 1791, attempting to escape their gilded cage, the royal family was captured, put in a far gloomier prison in the so-called
‘
Now, are you putting the pieces together, dear
reader? Think hard. Be brave.
Christ through Lucia, via her bishop, warns the Pope & Hierarchy that “…given they follow the example of the KING OF
This is simple, scholarly & publicly
available history, precious soul. We can read about St. Margaret Mary’s
plea to His Highness that it was Our Lord’s Will to consecrate the nation
of
Does it not dawn on you? If the popes REFUSE
to obey Jesus & Mary, they, too, will LOSE their Spiritually Regal
Throne, LOSE their Spiritually Regal Souls, and see the bitter END
of their direct Spiritually Regal Lineage, St. Peter’s Chair resting
quiet BETWEEN legitimate Roman bishops, we then seeing Spiritual Frauds
--- ANTIPOPES! --- perpetrating neo-pagan religious REVOLUTION.
Just like the kings of France and the French
Revolution in 1789, on into the 1790s. Incidentally, how long has it been since
a truly Catholic & French king has sat upon the throne of
Period. But do you doubt, having trouble believing the
facts, however logical?
Ah… let us look further at those bothersome
facts, dispelling the blindness.
Because the Novus Ordo
The problem, aside from a
comical awkwardness? The ‘secret’ was a fake.
Or, to be really precise, ’twas true prophecy… but NOT the 3rd Secret.
This is not
TNO ‘conspiracy theorizing’. Even middle-of-the-road CNO
journalists (at least at this point in
their lives they may be fairly considered as CNOs ---
Conservative Novus Ordoist) have investigated the
matter and reached the same conclusion. E.g., two famous Italian journalists,
Dr. Antonio Socci & Dr. Solideo
Paolini, have become staunch defenders of the ‘Vatican-release-is-not-the-Third-Secret’
thesis. Antonio Socci candidly admits he at first thought the claim an inane traditional fantasy
or rumor. However, to his credit, he is enough of an honest journalist that he
steadfastly & intelligently examined the evidence from all angles &
sources, finding holes & contradictions. Unable to get adequate access to
the Vatican officials that he had always been able to speak with before, due to
his titanic reputation in
Why the strong arm
tactics? What exactly is the Novus Ordo
The same thing the
So what did the Novus Ordo
The Vision that accompanied
the Third Secret.
Both scholarly TNO investigators and scholarly CNO investigators (such as the aforementioned Italian
journalists, Dr. Antonio Socci & Dr. Solideo Paolini) have
demonstrated, through historical records and detailed testimony of those
involved at the time, that Sister Lucia gave a notebook, along with her letter
that contained the Third Secret, to her bishop back in 1944. These two things
--- the letter & notebook --- then made their way to the
Because the demand for
+++ 50. The SEVENTH Devastating Argument:
+++
In Fatima Celestial Omens; 3 Secrets, the 3rd
Never Yet
Told; & a Solar Miracle for a New Age of the Son (Part 8)
Yet what did the text of the Vision say? And is
it relevant to us? You better believe it… it’s amazing how great
gifts can come from the hands of those who are your enemies! Apparently, Sr.
Lucia wrote the text of this Vision on 3 January 1944 at her religious convent
of the time in
“I [Lucia]
write in obedience to you, my God, who command me to
do so through his Excellency the Bishop of Leiria and
through your Most Holy Mother and mine. After the two parts which I have
already explained [i.e., the first two
parts of the Tripartite Fatima Message], at the left of Our Lady and a
little above, we saw an Angel with a flaming sword in his left hand; flashing,
it gave out flames that looked as though they would set the world on fire [this cannot help but remind the
scripturally astute reader of the angel set by God in most ancient times to
guard the entrance to the Garden of Paradise after Adam & Eve had been
expelled due to Original Sin, see Genesis 3:24]; but they died out in
contact with the splendour that Our Lady radiated
towards him from her right hand [that is
to say, Her Mercy as a Heavenly Mother had thus far succeeded in delaying
God’s Wrath being carried out through this Angel of Vengeance]:
pointing to the earth with his right hand, the Angel cried out in a loud voice:
‘Penance, Penance, Penance!’. And we saw in an immense light that
is God: ‘something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they
pass in front of it’ a Bishop dressed in White ‘we had the
impression that it was the Holy Father’ [namely, the Pope, who, although other members of Church or
Hierarchy may sometimes dress in white, it is normally the Pope --- in
recent times, leastwise --- who is most associated in Catholics’ minds
with a priestly attire of pure white]. Other Bishops, Priests,
men and women Religious going up a steep mountain, at the top of which
there was a big Cross of
rough-hewn trunks as of a cork-tree with the bark; before reaching there the Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins and
half trembling with halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for
the souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the
foot of the big Cross HE [THE POPE]
WAS KILLED BY A GROUP OF SOLDIERS WHO FIRED BULLETS AND ARROWS AT HIM,
AND IN THE SAME WAY THERE DIED ONE AFTER ANOTHER THE OTHER BISHOPS,
PRIESTS, MEN AND WOMEN RELIGIOUS, AND VARIOUS LAY PEOPLE OF
DIFFERENT RANKS AND POSITIONS. Beneath the two arms of the Cross there were two
Angels each with a crystal aspersorium [a
basin or vessel containing holy water, which may be sprinkled or
‘aspersed’ upon others, hence the Latin name of
‘aspersorium’] in his hand, in which they gathered up the blood
of the Martyrs [those genuine
Catholics who die for the sake of the One True Religion of Roman
Catholicism Whole & Undefiled, which death we may sometimes call
‘metaphorical’ because everything the martyr suffered was so
painful, horrible & atrocious as to be like ‘death’, even without
the shedding of blood unto real corporeal death --- in any case, blood is not
only almost totally composed of water, but every martyr’s blood
becomes like ‘holy water’ in the hands of these Angels, who asperse
it upon the martyrs’ souls in order to cleanse them of all their
sins… which is why Roman Catholicism has always taught that God forgives
martyrs of their sins without purgation, the ultimate price of
their lives for His Catholic Religion being the completely satisfactory purgation made before entering
Eternity] and with it sprinkled the souls that were making their way to
God.”
Note how Lucia saw the Pope ascending a mountain
with other bishops, priests, monks & nuns, at the top of which is a Cross?
And what is a Cross used for? Right. Crucifixion. How did Jesus die? Correct. The God-Man ---
Self-Eternal Author of Life --- chose agonizing crucifixion as His Means of
Divine Atonement for our terrible, terrible iniquities. And what happens to the
Pope and all of these bishops, priests, monks, nuns and even various lay people
(members of the Catholic Church who are
not in the clergy or religious life) as they reach the top of the mountain,
the Pope, at least, also reaching and falling to his knees at the foot of the
Cross? Yes. They die. How so? By soldiers shooting them to
death. And who are soldiers? Those who fight a war.
Why would soldiers slaughter clergy & laity, including the Pope? Because they hate Catholicity. Resultantly, these soldiers
must be enemies of Roman Catholicism & Her Church.
Following this so far? Good. Now remain brave,
stay logical, and finish the task.
CNOs or TNOs who recognize
that the Novus Ordo Vatican pulled a fast one and
managed, for the most part, to foist this Vision text on the world as if it
were the long awaited text of the Third Secret of Fatima, invariably assume ---
out of thin air --- that this slaughter of the Pope (they don’t often remember to mention the other clergy, laity
& religious dying, too, but never forget to focus on the Pope) is
something Our Lady warns will happen in what is now our not-too-distant future.
Meanwhile, a Novus Ordo Vatican worked overtime, with CNO Cd.
Ratzinger & LNO Cd. Sodano’s lengthy theological ‘commentary’
on the Vision text, to try to convince everybody (who paid attention, that is) that this slaughter of the Pope was
already over with & done, having been ‘fulfilled’ in the
unsuccessful assassination attempt on the life of Antipope John Paul II in
1981, which just happened to occur on… yes, I am not making this
up… May 13th. Now, you can get ‘conspiratorial’
and choose to believe that this was a really dangerous yet super clever way to
prepare for a time, soon to come, when John Paul II would pretend to release
Fatima’s 3rd Secret and, at the same moment, allow his two
Novus Ordo cardinals, commenting on the purported
text of the ‘secret’, to pass off the assassination as
‘fulfillment’ of this slaughtering of the Pope in the text of the
Vision.
But think about it. As tons of CNOs & TNOs have already
sensibly pointed out, Sr. Lucia’s Vision text shows the Pope MURDERED, period. Not
‘nearly killed’ or ‘partly injured but he survives’, or
etc., etc. No, MURDERED, end
of sentence. Oh, and what about the other
bishops, priests, monks, nuns & laity who die, too? What about
them? How was the unsuccessful attempt on John Paul’s life in 1981 in
any way at all a ‘fulfillment’ of this Vision in that regard? The assassin only attacked the antipope.
We could go on endlessly, yet facts are vivid. Ratzinger
& Sodano’s ‘explanations’ of
this Vision are illogical at best, and just plain silly at worst. The biggest
thing they had going for them, frankly, was the fact it happened May 13th.
Beyond that, there’s NO
correlation between the Vision and what happened to John Paul II in 1981. Lucia
doesn’t even note May 13 or any date in specific about when the horror
occurs. That’s why it’s tempting, conspiratorially speaking, to
hypothesize it was a set up the whole time. Possible? Certainly. Likely? No. Why wait so
long to capitalize on it if it were rigged?
So what is the best understanding of the Vision,
presuming the text is real?
Remember --- God is allegorical. His Creation is one giant allegory. Jesus,
too, God Incarnate, told parables
constantly during His three year ministry to His public, the Jews. “All
these things Jesus spoke in parables
to the multitudes [vast crowds who
gathered to Him everywhere He went in
Now do you understand,
my precious reader? Our Lady of Fatima gave to Sr. Lucia a Vision. This
allegorical Vision went along with, and corresponded to, the Third Secret of
the Tripartite Message of Fatima. The Novus Ordo
Vatican, in daringly releasing it to con people into thinking it was the Third
Secret, has given those ‘with ears to hear’ and ‘eyes to
see’ yet another key to unlocking the still hidden Message of Fatima when
it comes to the Third Secret. And the correct understanding of this allegorical
Vision would be?
The half ruined city is the City of
In a word, the Church appears to
‘fail’ --- just as Jesus did when He died upon the Holy Cross ---
Eternal Rome appears to lose the Catholic Faith Whole & Undefiled (the laying of Her Body in the Tomb, just as
Her Lord Jesus’ Body was laid in the Tomb for the 40 hours over the
course of 3 separate days), and St. Peter’s Throne sits empty for a
time, awaiting God’s Wrath to be exhausted, as He punishes both those who
ought to have been Roman Catholic and those who ought to have become Roman
Catholic, both incapable of finding His Saving Truth as He withdraws His
Copious Graces, all Modernists (which is
pretty much all of humanity today!) then left with hearts overwhelmed with
evil inclinations, unwilling to humbly seek His Truth.
“But oh!” says the perplexed reader
or antagonistic skeptic, calling his or herself ‘catholic’ in spite
of, mayhap (and sadly…), not being the real thing, “Aren’t
you forgetting
Easy as pie, my poor, dear, beloved, baffled
& precious soul. Think about it.
Were the hundreds of bishops involved at Vatican
I --- or the Vatican Council, as I prefer
to call it, not accepting Vatican II as a true Catholic Council since it dared
to notoriously & pertinaciously teach heresy, particularly
‘salvation-via-ignorance-and-sincerity’ --- uneducated or
stupid? I seriously doubt it. Since the 1500s, especially, a priest must be highly
trained. This keeps clergy from being uneducated, and tends to weed out the
stupid. Granted, a bishop could still be a bad bishop… yet the hundreds
of bishops involved at the Vatican Council were not idiots. Many of them were experts, some historical authorities when it
comes to the millennial chronology of the Church. Remember Chapters 13 to 27 of
this book, Inter Regnum, where we
went into comprehensive detail about the astonishingly long gaps God has
allowed between papacies, not to mention the shocking confusion He has
permitted as well regarding, precisely, who is really the pope? Well, then, do
you think the highly educated bishops participating at the Vatican Council
under Pope Pius IX from 1869 to 1870 were unaware of these papal
idiosyncrasies? Do you think the most expert of them --- those most highly trained in the long history and endless details of
the Church, especially Her Papacy --- were strangely uninformed or
oblivious to the fact of astonishingly long papal gaps, or surprising
confusion, from time to time, about who’s really the pope? If not, then how, possibly, can you,
my dear soul, think… without truly thinking about it rationally…
that these same bishops then meant, when, with Pope Pius IX’s
official & infallible approval, that “…a perpetual line of
successors…” must mean there are never any long gaps,
or never surprising confusion? How could they mean that when God has
plainly --- and inarguably! --- permitted some astonishingly long gaps and hideous confusion?
Eh? Clearly, you haven’t thought this
through very well or else you’re dishonest.
A “…PERPETUAL
line of successors…” to Peter MUST
mean that there will ALWAYS be ANOTHER pope, until Christ returns. Period. And NOT
that ‘there will never be any gaps’ or that ‘the gaps will
never exceed such-and-such amount of time’. Again,
period. To think otherwise is to NOT
think. Either that, or to think WRONGLY. Or, if proudly wicked, yet rational &
knowledgeable, to think MENDACIOUSLY,
telling lies of a brazenly self-serving & uncharitable nature. What would
make you be so EVIL?
I’d prefer to think, precious reader, that you’re not that wicked. Am I right?
Oh, I surely hope so. The world is filled with
enough evil & chaos already.
Yet in dispensing with the ‘
They can’t. The exposé above shows a
flaw at each of their arguments’ cores.
Which brings us back to the
Vision. Assuming it’s real --- and all the evidence indicates that it
is --- then, once more, we’ve excellent reason to believe Our Lady of
Fatima was foretelling an
extraordinarily long & confusing papal interregnum. Maybe a pope
will wind up murdered at the hands of soldiers. I’m not going to pretend
I’m infallible. It could happen. Yet that seems unlikely, given the
allegorical nature of the Vision. It wasn’t just a pope. It was lots of bishops, priests, monks,
nuns & laity, as well. And, whilst I can’t pretend to know,
either, that
Once all these Catholics are murdered --- Our Lady through Lucia very carefully
remarking that it is “various” laity that die with their
clergy, subtly yet obviously implying how, perhaps, at a bare minimum, a
very few evade this spiritual massacre, remaining steadfast Roman
Catholics Whole & Undefiled --- it is the breaking out of the Great
Apostasy into the open, all over the world, with the devil and his demons now
nigh well totally unrestrained, able to make progress in evil &
abominations with unparalleled speed & success. This is because the murder
of these Catholics represents the loss of real Catholicism in everyone still
alive on earth. Which is exactly what we’ve seen.
Because there are hardly any souls left on earth who are Catholic, we are
spiritually starving in a religious famine… and, most grievous of all, there are no truly Catholic monks or
nuns averting God’s Wrath for us, no truly Catholic bishops or
priests defending & saving Catholic souls, or converting non-Catholic souls
to Catholicism and their sole hope, heavenly speaking, for salvation, and there
is no pope upon Peter’s Throne, by his Princely Authority opposing
& restraining Lucifer. Instead,
we have antipopes & Modernism galore, with anti-Catholicism
and anti-Christ run amuck, deluding
humanity as a whole, ushering in the sorcerous New Aeon of the Sun, which is the Ancient Dragon, Lucifer,
masquerading as an Angel of Light, inverting good & evil.
As said previously, all pious Fatima scholars
agree the Vision is a real
And all because a couple of 20th
century popes wouldn’t do two simple things:
Command their bishops all over the world, on a
single day and at a single time, to publicly consecrate the nation of
That’s it. That’s all it amounted to.
How hard is that? Why the disobedience?
In the meantime, despite the invaluable testimony
of the text of this Vision, its release evoked puzzlement, amusement &
ridicule. Look at the text of the Vision --- put forth by the Novus Ordo
And so we close with some further words of Sister
Lucia in 1936. She was writing to Father Gonçalves
regarding the appearance of Our Lord & Lady to her in the chapel at the
convent in Tuy, Spain, in 1929, where They told Lucia
it was time for her to make known to the Holy Father their request that he, and
all his bishops in the Church, on a single day at a single time, publicly &
officially, consecrate the Russian nation to the Immaculate & Sorrowful
Heart of Mary. Of course, Pope Pius XI did not cooperate. Lucia then described
Our Lord as ‘complaining’ about the pope’s refusal. This is
EXHIBIT NO. 15, as well, the last part.
And Jesus Christ had said to her:
“They did not want to heed My
request. Like the KING OF FRANCE they will repent and do so, BUT IT
WILL BE LATE. Russia will already
have SPREAD HER ERRORS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD, causing WARS AND
PERSECUTIONS of the Church.”
Question --- has a King of France yet returned to
the Throne of France since 1789? No. As a matter of fact, King Louis XVI lost
his head to the guillotine in 1793. Moreover, in 1789 he became a virtual
‘prisoner’ at the Tuileries Palace, and
had no absolute authority, being a so-called ‘constitutional
monarch’, subject to the will of the ‘National Assembly’ (a kind of French Parliament of the time),
and not free to do as he saw fit, like a truly sovereign king. Nor did later briefly ruling ‘kings’ of
They were also over with by 1870.
So how is it Our Lord said in 1931, “Like the King of
Only then, in a hence far unknown time to come,
will French Kings rule once more. Solely at that unknown time to come, will it
be possible for real French Kings to finally repent of their forefathers’
mistakes, beg God’s forgiveness, be truly & virtuously Roman Catholic,
and, finally, obey what Christ told them to do all the way back in 1689. To
wit, consecrate the nation of
Likewise the Papacy.
This is why Jesus said to Lucia that “…it will be late.”
Namely, a real pope will some day, finally, consecrate the nation of
It will be in the future. Maybe
not too long from today… but not right away.
The popes lost their first chance by the middle
of the twentieth century.
All the sin & confusion since then has been
because of this.
It’s why we’re in the Great Apostasy
and CNOs ask:
“Is the pope Catholic? I’m not so
sure anymore.”
It’s not even a ‘funny’ joke
like it used to be.
Because Antipope Francis is
that horrible.
Time is running out, dear soul. The devil knows
this, too. Maybe there was a ‘one hundred year deal’ or maybe there
wasn’t. Doesn’t matter. God gave over
Catholics and the world to terrible punishment --- the Amos Curse and loss of the True Faith Whole, Entire & Undefiled
everywhere on earth --- and Lucifer has had free reign since then.
That free reign is petering in (pun intended).
The Real Reign of a Real Peter is about to return. It may take a few more
decades. Or maybe not. Maybe it’s sooner than we
think. Whichever, the scent of change is in the air. A new spirit is arising.
Catholic Prophecy harbors a prediction of a ‘Second Pentecost’.
Pentecost this year was just a few days previous as I write. Perhaps it’s
a harbinger of what’s to come. The Novus Ordoists
positively wax poetic about the ‘Spirit of Vatican II’. That spirit
was diabolic. Let Catholics --- real
Catholics who aren’t afraid or ashamed of the Church of Rome’s
infallible truth, especially ‘no Salvation outside the Church’ in
its ancient, original, correct, strict & unchanging sense --- revel in
the Spirit of Truth, Holy Truth!, with equally poetic luster. Let there be a
continuation of the 19th century Vatican Council, mayhap, or a new
Lateran Council --- Lateran VI --- or Super One Man Papal Council, wherein a
single holy & wise Bishop of Rome infallibly & explicitly affirms or
forbids every loophole still in existence, doctrinally speaking, making it
impossible for satan, ever again, to spread his
feathered, reptilian wings over earth, looming darkness.
You have seen the evidence, precious soul. And the logic, beloved reader.
Now go, and sin no more. Who is left to condemn
you? Do penance.
The
From there, Christ the King vanquishes the entire
earth.
Cor Jesu, miserére nobis! Cor Maria, ora pro nobis!
Ad majorem Dei gloriam. Ad Jesum per Mariam.
Extra Ecclesiam nulla
Salus. ¡Viva Cristo Rey!
Ecce Agnus Dei. Vero… veritas vincit. Amen.
AN AFTERWORD:
+++ 1. Last Remarks to Drive It Home (Part
1) +++
There is so much more we could say about Our Lady
of Fatima and Vatican II.
For instance, regarding ‘the dogma of
the Faith’ that is disbelieved & lost all over the world
during the Great Apostasy in the wake of the Vatican II Pseudo-Council, we have
LNO (Liberal Novus Ordoist)
Fr. Karl Rahner himself commenting on the truly
massive & shocking change made at Vatican II with nobody at all --- not
even TNOs (Traditional Novus Ordoists) --- batting an eyelash, as if it were a
dreadful, scandalous & destructive abomination. Remember him? A German
theologian who was in ‘hot water’ with the Vatican authorities
until John XXIII unexpectedly appointed him to be one of the countless ‘periti’ (‘experts’)
at Vatican II in November of 1962. The scholars are practically unanimous in
agreeing Rahner dominated Vatican II theologically.
This is why, as we have said, as a result of more
than any other theological influence, both Lumen
gentium and Ad
gentes (two
of the pseudo-council’s sixteen documents) briefly yet explicitly (and thus notoriously & pertinaciously!)
taught the deceit of
‘salvation-through-ignorance-and-sincerity’, what Rahner called his theory of the ‘anonymous
Christian’. You might ask (if not
accepting of ‘no Salvation outside the Church’ in its original,
ancient, strict, correct & unchanging sense), “Well, then, why
didn’t any bishops at Vatican II balk
if this was a gravely sinful falsehood?” Simple… because the modern
form of Salvation Heresy (it’s all
about the poor people who are ‘invincibly ignorant’) had
already been worming its way into theological theory & seminary training
for five centuries. It
reached ‘critical mass’ in the 1700s, that
is, simultaneous to the Endarkenment [Enlightenment]. Proof of this is easy
to see. For example, study the public writings of the popes of the first half
of the 1800s They were again & again reminding
their fellow bishops of ‘no Salvation outside the Church’ and
warning against the spread of
the false teaching that non-Catholics could be ‘saved’. Rahner merely took this false doctrine, came up with his
own personal theological ‘justification’ for it, and, all of the
bishops there at Vatican II already basically in agreement, awed by his
reputation… then, voilà! It’s now
an ‘official’ teaching.
But really no surprise. After all, bishops in the United States had been
promoting ‘salvation-via-ignorance-and-sincerity’ in Baltimore
Catechism No. 3 since the 1920s (this
particular catechism had a profound effect on the generations of the 1920s,
’30s, ’40s & ’50s in America, prior to Vatican II during
the 1960s, after which the catechisms made in its aftermath became even more
loose, liberal & egregious about how someone saves his or her soul),
albeit, the Baltimore Catechism published first in 1885 as well promoted the
Salvation Heresy, but in a more ‘conservative’ form. Yet the
evidence found in Baltimore Catechism No. 3? Just look in the section called
‘Lesson Eleven’, which is about the Church, and examine the answers
to Questions 509 to 512. It is blatantly there, teaching you that human beings
can belong to the Catholic Church ‘invisibly’, without actually
& visibly believing & professing Roman Catholicity. Various other
catechisms throughout the world were teaching people similarly. (Although, beware. The publishing history of
the
This is why Karl Rahner
and his fellow ‘experts’ could dare to openly craft the documents
of Lumen gentium
and Ad gentes
to uphold
‘salvation-in-the-state-of-a-sincere-and-invincible-ignorance’ with
absolutely no backlash or repercussions --- not even from the most
‘conservative’ of these bishops. Rahner
noted this surprising change. In a short book published in 1967, right after
Vatican II ended in 1965, The Christian
of the Future, he observes, with an astonishing frankness and great
scholarly knowledge:
“For Christendom [Roman Catholic nations] in
earlier times the Church was the plank of salvation in the shipwreck of the world, the small barque [tiny boat] on which alone men are saved, the small band of those who
are saved by the miracle of grace from the massa damnata [huge bulk of humanity that are
damned, the learned scholar, Rahner, putting it in
Latin, of course], and the extra ecclesiam
nulla salus [that is to say, ‘no salvation
outside the church’, in Latin again] WAS UNDERSTOOD IN A VERY EXCLUSIVE AND PESSIMISTIC SENSE…
And when he [a future
‘christian’, meaning a ‘Novus Ordoist’
and hence no true Catholic!] studies the history of this Council [read: Vatican II Pseudo-Council] which
we are living through [Rahner composed some of this book during Vatican II and
some of it after the Pseudo-Council, but, in any case, the outcome of Vatican
II was immediate, destructive and, as it were, the shocking effects seemed to
‘go on’ for several years after its formal close on December 8,
1965], he will be astonished
that this statement was made at the Council quietly and spontaneously without opposition, without surprise,
without anyone’s appearing to notice just what was being said [Rahner does NOT here directly refer to the change
in how these so-called ‘roman catholic’ bishops were interpreting ‘no Salvation
outside the Church’, though, logically, within the context of his overall
words, he is INARGUABLY indirectly
speaking about reinterpretation
of the Salvation Dogma to mean ‘anyone may enter Heaven’, including
any perfectly intelligent
human being who dies NOT believing
in ROMAN CATHOLICISM Whole, Entire
& Undefiled]… This Christian of the future [the Novus Ordoist]
--- encouraged by this statement of Vatican II in the Constitution of the
Church [Lumen gentium]
and really authorized by it,
in fact OFFICIALLY FOR THE FIRST TIME
--- knows that the morning light on the mountains is the beginning of the day
in the valley, not the light of day above condemning the darkness beneath [Rahner here
poetically professes the ‘Universalism’ heresy… i.e., no human is ever condemned to an eternal hell, everybody --- even non-Catholics! --- gets salvation]. (Karl Rahner’s
The Christian of the Future, in
Chapter 5, entitled “The Teaching of Vatican II on the Church and the
Future Reality of Christian Life”, drawn from the section “The
Church Is the Sacrament of the World’s Salvation”, in turn found in
Paragraphs 3, 2 & 5, respectively. All emphasis & annotation added.)
Do you see? This is how Vatican II gave us the
Great Apostasy.
Or, for instance, consider a little known fact
about Antipope John Paul II. In Polish, originally, his name is Karol Jósef Wojtyla. He was
ordained in 1946, and consecrated in 1958, becoming auxiliary bishop --- and
later archbishop --- of
The first, Dignitatis humanae, is abominable because…
whilst not blatantly touting Salvation Heresy… it nevertheless kowtows to
the Modernist ‘dogma’ that all human beings (even in wholly
Catholic nations!) should have the ‘liberty’ to believe &
practice whatever religion he or she chooses. Why? Because our human
‘dignity’ demands it (the
title itself means ‘human dignity’). It matters not that it is rationally
impossible for every single religion to be entirely true, ergo, only
one of earth’s many religions can, at best, really be fully
true. Even wholly Catholic nations must now permit (even encourage!)
their citizens to believe & practice false
religions, an idea the One True Church of Catholicism has never taught or allowed, period.
Mind you, Our Lord’s Singular Religion of Roman Catholicism has never taught or allowed forced
‘conversion’. Adequately intelligent people forced to be
‘catholic’ is no real
conversion at all. Notwithstanding, every good & wholly Catholic
nation makes & enforces laws restraining
non-Catholics from practicing their false religions openly, or from
proselytizing others. Why? Because Catholics are so
‘cruel’? May God forbid! Contrarily, because Catholics are
to be loving, and, in a country where Roman
Catholicism rules, it would be supremely cruel to help souls wind up in hell.
Thus, if the Church alone saves souls, restrain
false & damning religions!
The second, Gaudium et spes --- which in Latin means
‘joy and hope’, by the way --- is abominable because it tries to
make ‘peace’ with the modern world (read: a world in love with the Religion of Modernism, hence innately
& intrinsically opposed to the Religion of Catholicism) by
‘embracing’ Modernist beliefs or practices instead of defying
them. The result? A ‘church’ that then
mimics the world rather than converting the world to the
Singularly Saving Faith of Roman Catholicism! This Vatican II document, along
with Lumen gentium,
are the two ‘biggies’ of Vatican II’s
16 total ‘statements’ that were ‘reorienting’
self-styled ‘catholics’ from seeking to save immortal human souls via conversion to the Church, toward supporting Modernist people in building a new civilization wherein people
are more comfortable, well-to-do and ‘free’.
Missions therefore transforms
into promoting ‘social justice’,
respect for ‘personal dignity’
(causing proselytism to the Catholic Church to become a ‘nasty’ and
‘repugnant’ objective), and assisting with ‘self-realization’ (read: ‘free to do whatever
makes individual human persons the happiest & content he or she can be in
this life’). ‘Humanism’ is now the goal, under the guise
of it being ‘christian’, which is, accordingly, a way to say,
“Humanity is central; we seek ‘heaven’ on earth.”
Thus, it’s now bad to say the Church
alone saves, or oppose false religion!
And these are simply two of sixteen documents
total Vatican II produced, that an individual known as Karol Woytyla played a major role in writing when he was the
archbishop of Kraków, Poland (an openly Communist nation at the time,
incidentally), and who later became Antipope John Paul II in 1978, the
world’s media delighting in portraying him as such a ‘conservative
pope’, who was, indeed, perilously ‘undoing’ Vatican II’s ‘wonderful & enlightened
achievements’ and ‘too much focusing on’ annoying things like
‘tradition’ and ‘authority’. Which
was a complete crock. He engineered key ‘reorientations’ at
the Pseudo-Council, never once denounced it, continually praised &
supported it until the end of his life in 2005, and constantly parroting the
Novus Ordo ‘party line’ that the Vatican
II Pseudo-Council was the beginning of a ‘springtime of renewal’
for the new ‘church’ of Novus Ordoism. Conservative? Not really. He only adjusted tone & pace
in order to reassure the ‘conservatives’ or
‘traditionalists’ that nothing was amiss, that the
‘church’ was indestructible and ‘unchanging’, remaining
--- supposedly --- whole & entire in ‘catholicity’. The
subterfuge was a resounding success, John Paul II a veritable
‘superstar’ amongst CNOs, they strangely
blind to all his glaringly public anti-Catholicity. As if being 80% Catholic is
‘good enough’, making you a ‘pope’.
Oh, but are you skeptical regarding John Paul II’s anti-Catholicity? Assuming it’s something
you actually care about (but just
haven’t figured it out yet, totally), then
examine
Helplessly Ignorant carefully
in the Books & Articles section, with an utter thoroughness. Yes,
it’s long. I’m sorry about that. Yet if you care for the truth,
especially God’s Saving Truth, then it’s
well worth the effort. In it we comprehensively affirm ‘no Salvation
outside the Church’ in its ancient, original, strict, correct & unchanging
sense with ironclad logic and massive testimony from the Catholic Church Herself,
with our dear John Paul II’s
apostate denial of the Salvation Dogma and what Missions is for particularly
demonstrated in Part 3 of this book, constituting Chapters 49 to 69.
You might want to read it. You’re not
infallible, and (gasp!) it may be right.
Yet how does this connect to Our Lady of Fatima
and the Third Secret?
Recollect ‘the dogma of the Faith’
preserved in Portugal with a mysterious ‘etc.’ No doubt exists for
a cautious & pious Fatima scholar --- this was Lucia’s way of hinting
about the 3rd Secret without fully & explicitly revealing
it before it was time, as per the Blessed Virgin Mary’s wishes and
the very practical reason that it would be far easier to understand in
1960. An unanticipated worldwide
council suddenly announced by an elderly ‘caretaker’ pope, John
XXIII, the year before in 1959, is the obvious link. Moreover, John
XXIII was surprisingly --- even shockingly! --- disrespectful to his
predecessors in his opening speech at Vatican II in 1962, twitting
‘end-of-the-world’ or ‘apocalyptic’ type Catholics on
the nose for their being such ‘gloomy Guses’,
thinking the world is getting more & more evil, and more &
more anti-Catholic. And, when it comes to heresy, which false teaching (contradicting millennial old and unchanging
interpretation by the Infallible Roman Catholic Church…) did his odd
new pseudo-council, Vatican II, wind up officially, notoriously &
pertinaciously peddling three
different times in two different documents with formal promulgation of it by his successor, Paul VI? Yes. The heresy of ‘salvation-via-ignorance-and-sincerity’.
Comprehending, my dear soul? Furthermore, the pope
& his bishops, daring to notoriously & pertinaciously deny Christ three
times over like St. Peter again, consequently suffered automatic excommunication,
as Canon Law requires.
Getting the connection now? We may not know the
exact wording of the one page Message of Fatima in its Third Secret, or its every detail, but we can
know with moral certainty --- with all of the testimony & facts
available to us, combined with rational & logical deduction --- its essential content & meaning.
To wit, that a very bad council was
about to occur, that in this bad council heresy would be clearly & undeniably taught as if it were
‘official’ and ‘true’, and that, as a result, global apostasy would break out openly,
from inside the Church Herself, from
the top of the Church’s Hierarchy, and that, as a further result,
the thrones of the Hierarchy would sit
empty for a time, between rulers, their spiritual & religious
jurisdiction ripped from them as punishment for their evil, God’s Mighty
Wrath inflicting upon the world the
Amos Curse and loss of Roman Catholicity everywhere on earth, till, His
Wrath exhausted, His Mercy returns, He miraculously restoring what was lost, with a Second Pentecost and the Body of
Catholicism, His One True Church of Rome, resurrected for the world to see.
+++ 2. Last Remarks to Drive It Home (Part
2) +++
Two notes before we move on and conclude this
relatively short Afterword.
The aforementioned Joseph Ratzinger
(a liberal German theologian priest who,
as the Cologne bishop’s personal ‘peritus’
or ‘expert’, took part in Vatican II as an observer who, nonetheless,
had a role in shaping its outcome), later to be the CNO Cd.
Ratzinger under Antipope John Paul II in the Novus Ordo Vatican Curia, operated as the head of the
‘Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith’. While doing this,
several speeches & articles of his were put together and, in 1987,
published in English under the title, Principles
of Catholic Theology: Building Stones for a Fundamental Theology. I
don’t possess this book, but have excellent & reliable sources
concerning its text (read: these aren’t
crackpot ‘fake news’ sources, being scholarly & reputable)
--- and, anyhow, it’s publication & contents were reported
upon by Novus Ordo journalists all around the
world --- but in an earlier French version of this book, printed in
1982, you can see precisely what I’m about to remark upon in Pages 426
to 427. What did the CNO Cardinal say? He commented on Vatican II and, in
speaking about Gaudium et spes (look at the paragraphs above if you don’t
recall what this gigantic --- literally, in terms of the writings of councils
over the centuries --- and major
So what was his point? The conclusion is plain.
We must face the facts.
Antipope Benedict XVI (Ratzinger’s official title since being
an antipope from 2005 to 2013, when he abdicated) was calling Pope Pius IX’s 1864 Syllabus
of Errors wrong. Oh, I know, he couched it as a
‘balance’ to the Syllabus of
Errors and not an outright ‘clash’. Yet this is diplomatic
Novus Ordo talk. He wants us to think there is not
contradiction, that it’s just a matter of semantics,
how we choose to ‘word’ something. But he’s not stupid. He is
incredibly highly educated and a very smart man. Are we stupid? Dear reader, I hope not. I’m going to
optimistically presume, for the sake of charity, that you’re not, as well
as assuming --- again, for that sake of charity --- that you have, minimally at
least, some good will. Therefore, we
must face facts. Ratzinger can
‘interpret’ & ‘spin’ the words all he wants… yet the truth is still the truth.
He was calling Pope Pius IX’s
Syllabus wrong, hence very necessary to change or correct.
Call it whatever you want. Say Gaudium et spes ‘tweaked’
it a little (a lot, actually…).
Say Gaudium
‘updated’ the language, or made it ‘understandable’ to
modernized people. Say whatever you want. You’re free to do so, right? Surely. Howsoever, don’t
expect me to buy into your theory. Infallible
definitions or condemnations are irreformable
& unchangeable, comprehended rightly. In the meantime, Gaudium et spes most certainly did NOT simply help people to comprehend Pius IX’s
Syllabus ‘rightly’ or
‘better’. To the contrary, it contradicted
& defied Pius’ Syllabus,
rejecting his rejection of
the modern world and its Religion of Modernism,
thereby welcoming a modern
world and its Religion of Modernism with open arms. What’s more, this astounding
change occurred barely 100 years after the Syllabus.
Suddenly, what in 1864 was infallibly wrong was, strangely,
alright by 1965. Revolution? I think so. 1789 had finally transpired inside
of God’s Church.
From inside of St.
Peter’s Basilica at
Have the revolutionaries won? Seems
so. The Body is in the Tomb.
Leading us back to Sister
Lucia, one of three precious little seers at
Per one account, near the end of Lucia’s
life, a man of high authority (CNO Cd. Carlo Caffarra)
communicated with her via letter during his role as the head of John Paul II’s ‘Pontifical Institute for Studies on
Marriage & Family’ (the
addition of John Paul’s name to this Vatican organization’s
official title was not added, as far as I can tell, until after he had died in
2005). This transpired, apparently, during the early 1980s when he was
setting up the institute, and he wrote to ask for her prayers in regards to his
work. She replied at some length, per him, and included these much repeated
words lately (i.e., repeated by CNOs & TNOs who are alert enough to realize their
importance):
“…the DECISIVE BATTLE between the Lord and the
(Testimony of CNO Cd. Caffarra to the online news source of ‘Aleteia’ --- which is, it would seem, a play on the
Greek word for ‘truth’, usually transliterated into English as
‘alítheia’ --- a self-described
‘christian’ group, but whose reporting is, to my knowledge, both
professional & impeccable. Indeed… if not, why would a high ranking Novus Ordo official
agree to speak on the record with them? The interview is dated 17 January
2017, and, as of 26 May 2018, is posted at
https://aleteia.org/2017/01/17/fatima-visionary-to-cardinal-final-battle-between-god-and-satan-will-be-over-marriage-and-family/.)
Any wonder, then, why, since the beginning of the
21st century, we have a most unrelenting press for the
‘redefinition’ of marriage, why there was a ‘sexual
revolution’ by the close of the 1960s and why ‘abortion’ was
made ‘legal’ in the United States in 1973 as well as all around
almost all the other parts of the world, including, it would seem, just now, in
the formerly staunchly Roman Catholic nation of Ireland? Is it a wonder that
Communist Soviet Russia was the first nation in the world to do so?
We could go on, but I think you’ve got the
idea. Our Lady of Fatima and Her Third Secret is still very relevant. And why,
by 1960, was Her Message not openly released like it was supposed to be, and
why, in the wake of the Vatican II Pseudo-Council --- when every heresy &
immorality in the world is tolerated with utmost patience, or the evil
perpetrators merely ‘slapped on the hand’, when the Novus Ordo Vatican no longer forbids ‘catholics’ to
read or watch anything at all… no matter how offensive and immoral…
and monks & nuns now permitted all kinds of freedoms or privileges undreamt
of in former times --- is Sr. Lucia, in her convent in Europe, in total
contradistinction to all else, quarantined and forbidden to talk about Fatima?
What’s the deal? Is everything permissible except
Catholicity & Sr. Lucia?
Pretty sure you know the answer. If honest, you
know what’s going on.
I cannot resist one final note. Ever wonder why
the Novus Ordo
Yes, one of the Seven Hills of Ancient Rome, named for the heavens. More often described as
the Caelian Hill, the meaning is the same. And John Paul II’s
symbolism, when you realize he was an antipope and a conscious enemy of the
Oh, and his antipapal name? He derived it from
his very brief predecessor.
Who, we kid you not, took the antipapal title of
John Paul and, 33 days later
--- amazingly enough, yes, that number
again! --- was found suddenly & unexpectedly lifeless in his
apartment, in his bed. A professional journalist investigated the whole matter
and concluded, much to the chagrin of the Novus Ordo
Again, we could go on, but this is enough to show
everything is relevant.
Yet, perchance, a scholarly or skeptical reader
is concerned about a lack of proper citations in many of the quotes dealing
with Our Lady of Fatima. I apologize. This is a long book by most
people’s standards (though rather
short by my own standards…), and, while I realize, humanly speaking,
very few people are ever going to read it, what is said is crucial, something any real
Catholic should know and something that anyone, who is becoming Catholic, needs to find out. Otherwise, how will anything change? And such citations are many,
often lengthy, frequently impenetrable to the average person, and merely make
the dauntingly ‘long’ book all that more long-looking &
daunting.
Hence why I’ve avoided
citations half the time for Part 5 and Fatima.
I offer instead, a proper bibliography for the scholarly or skeptical reader. Meaning,
you’re not going to find every single exact page reference for the
quotations, but these will show you sources
from which I’ve drawn, and their legitimacy, authenticity & scholarly reliability, etc.
Savvy? In other words --- you do the leg work. If you’re a scholarly person (or just really, really determined to be skeptical), then get off
your hinder quarters, show some initiative, act like you care about the truth,
and do the investigation for yourself. You’d have to do the very same
thing even if I gave the excruciatingly precise references.
I’m just going to give less excruciatingly precise references and
then let you, the reader, go at it. If
I can do it, then so can you.
And Almighty God has not told
me, personally, that I’ve got to do all
the legwork for everyone. So
I feel perfectly content about this. If
you’ve doubts, then search.
End of sentence. The bibliography, though? Peruse
on, my precious soul:
The most scholarly & extensive work by far,
up till this moment, is Frère Michel de la Sainte Trinité’s
truly massive, gargantuan and academic work, The Whole Truth About Fatima. His investigation, interviews,
studies & writing literally took decades. I have no idea if it’s
still in print, but I’m confident you could find it and purchase it via
the cloud. If I could stumble upon it by accident in a large used book store in
gigantic Los Angeles, even before I had became Catholic, then I’m pretty
sure you, beloved reader, can find it somewhere if you’re determined.
Obviously, Frère Michel is French (his
former Abbot apparently led much respectful opposition to Paul VI in the wake
of Vatican II, tirelessly pointing out the many, many, many horrible problems
with this insidious pseudo-council, even confronting Paul VI in person at one
point, much to Paul’s discomfort…) and, as far as I can tell,
the English translation has never been available in another format except in paperback.
It’s long, easily more than 2000 pages. (Makes my writings seem a little less intimidating, eh?) But, I
assure you, well worth reading every single sentence, if you’re curious
& attempting to figure out what, exactly, happened during & after
Other works used are less massive and, mayhap,
less academic, but still practically bursting with scholarly citations, at
least in the hundreds. Frère François de Marie des Anges wrote Fatima:
Tragedy and Triumph, presumably as a follow up to Frère
Michel’s The Whole Truth About Fatima, being sort of like its
‘fourth’ volume. Immaculate Heart Publications also printed this
book (please see paragraph above for details),
the French version originally published in
Hopefully, this gives you excellent grounds from
which to go on.
+++ 3. How Do We Get Out of This Mess? +++
This last & final chapter is surprisingly
simple.
How do we get out of this mess? How do real Roman Catholics --- still holding, or beginning to hold, all of the Church’s
Infallible & Precious Dogmas Whole,
Entire & Undefiled, in defiance of a now almost completely Modernist world, including those
persisting in calling themselves, strangely, ‘catholic’, even when
they’re plainly not
anything like what Catholics once
& always were! --- do anything of worth to try resolving this hideous delusion?
We’ve already fixed
ourselves… if Catholic.
What about the rest of the world? The answer is
twofold, broadly speaking.
First, humanly speaking, if enough people slowly
yet surely --- and with a moral certainty! --- actually become true
Roman Catholics, then, it’s conceivable, we could gradually get into
contact with each other and establish friendly relations. This can be
difficult. If not knowing what I mean, then you probably cannot believe how
hard it is, oftentimes, finding anyone who is truly Catholic, let alone be sure
they are what they insist they are, or who don’t go Catholic
fundamentalist on you and start acting odd, belligerent & unhinged.
Nonetheless, God could give us enough opportunities, astonishing loads of
grace, and allow us to find & befriend each other.
If so, then what? At a certain point, if peaceable &
charitable… as well as thinking enough alike each other, with good sense
& hard facts making our resolutions correct… then we could,
plausibly, discuss how to return a real pope to St. Peter’s Throne.
I know, it sounds ‘unbelievable’ right now, but it is thinkable.
The catch is this:
Most people don’t realize (including those who are supposed to be real
Catholics) that only a
Bishop of
End of sentence. The real
solution?
Real Catholics have to live in the Roman
Diocese again. Maybe there are some real Catholics in
Then, once there, and if in peaceful union &
agreement, under the most ancient of ecclesiastical canon law, such
real Catholics could, then, seriously & lawfully consider electing a
new Bishop of Rome. Yet what about valid
consecration as a bishop, you ask? A very good
question. As far as I can tell, TNOs (Traditional
Novus Ordoists), for the most part, have kept a proper form & matter when it
comes to the Sacrament of Holy Orders.
They’re not Catholic,
true, denying, at a bare minimum, the infallible dogma of ‘no Salvation outside the Church’ in its most
ancient, original, strict, infallible & correct sense. (By the way, Novus Ordoists at the
Vatican have toyed with the form & matter of their NO
‘sacraments’, leaving most, if not all, invalid, and ---
even if not invalid --- seriously doubtful. Which, by canon law,
means you can’t rely on them, even if, all the same, they just
‘happened’ to valid. Doubt destroys legal confidence in them.)
Now, imagine. I know it’s hard, I know it seems ‘impossible’.
But what if a miracle occurred? What
if one of those TNO bishops --- who had been, without doubt, validly consecrated, abjured his
heresy and professed Catholicism
Whole, Entire & Undefiled? What then? Why, this would change
everything. Just like Rome decided, in ancient times, that the Eastern Schismatics
had, nevertheless, kept their form & matter in the case of Holy Orders,
making it possible for a schismatic bishop to abjure heresy
& schism, and, permission from Rome forthcoming, could then have lawful jurisdiction over any Catholics in his diocese,
so, too, could such a TNO bishop,
converted to real Catholicism,
either
be elected, or else consecrate a man elected, as pope.
This is the human side. Now to
the Heavenly Side of Things.
Catholic Prophecy has predicted a ‘Second Pentecost’. One saintly religious even predicted that
Ss. Peter & Paul themselves would come down from Heaven in visible form,
laying their hands upon the man God chooses to be the next pope, and thus
making it inarguable, for every Catholic witnessing this, that this was indeed
the next Bishop of Rome. And, if not
consecrated, Ss. Peter & Paul could easily supply that deficiency in
a visible form, giving him the
Sacrament of Holy Orders right then and there.
Case closed.
In either situation, plainly, God would have to
act in a supernatural way. For instance, what about diehard skeptics? Perhaps
they’re truly Catholic. But they just can’t bring themselves to
believe, or at least trust, that the new Bishop of Rome really is he who
Almighty God has determined to be the Pope. What then? Easy.
God
does some flabbergasting miracles. This usually brings the debate
to a quick close.
I don’t mean to sound flippant, dear
reader. But this is no stumper.
God started Roman Catholicism in
He can do so again in
It’s not a real problem. It’s only up
to Him.
Let us wait on the Lord, and pray.
And beseech His Mother.
Amen.
+
+ +
Part One of Inter Regnum (Chapters 1-12)
Part Two of Inter Regnum (Chapters 13-27)
Part Three of Inter Regnum (Chapters 28-34)
Part Four of Inter Regnum (Chapters 35-42)
+
+ +
Pilate’s
query met:
Note:
if you’ve come
to this webpage directly from a search
engine or other
website, then, when done viewing this webpage
--- and assuming
you wish to view more of this website’s pages ---
please type the
website’s address (as given above right before this
note) into the
address bar at the top of your browser and hit the
‘enter’ button on the keyboard of your computer.
Please go here about use of the writings
on this website.
© 2018 by
Paul Doughton.
All rights
reserved.