Beware
of
Richard
Ibranyi & His Group,
‘Mary’s
Little Remnant’
I have literally just finished writing a careful (and hopefully fair & charitable)
admonishment regarding the
Dimond brothers. It is therefore fitting that I turn
to admonishment of a man named Mr. Richard Ibranyi. How so? Because he was in
the Dimonds’ ‘monastery’ in the northeastern part of the
United States for 2 or 3 years, the two respective parties then splitting from
one another --- literally, a schism --- over the issue of so-called ‘sedevacantism’.
Sedevacantism is better termed ‘interregnumism’, about which you
may learn
here.
Put pithily, it simply means the One True Church is enduring
the long foretold Great Apostasy, and that part of God’s Punishment of our
iniquities involves the Roman Diocese being between true &
legitimate bishops for a surprisingly long time (from a typical human perspective), together with a terrifically
hideous confusion causing nearly all, whether claiming Catholicity or
not, to believe post-Vatican II antipopes are ‘popes’ (when, in fact, they’re not
even truly Catholic). Dear Mr. Ibranyi was quicker in realizing this fact
than the Dimonds. Sadly, both Dimonds & Ibranyi are quite stubborn,
outspoken and quick to cross swords.
How do I know this? Because I knew Mr. Ibranyi personally,
befriending him for a number of years, and I have studied the Dimonds’ website
or their other public materials adequately enough to realize they are of a
similar temperament to Richard Ibranyi. This really isn’t surprising.
Almost no one is truly Catholic right now… this being one of God’s
just scourges for our sins… and, if you do become truly Catholic, or at
least greatly resemble something like real Catholicity, then it takes a
strong-willed soul. Defying the Modernist teachings of an entire world is not
easy for most of us. Consequently, those who do, tend to be rather bullheaded
and ready to fight.
And that includes myself. I do not exempt
myself from this tendency.
Yet how did Mr. Ibranyi & I become acquainted? And why do I dare
to ‘remotely’ admonish him, not to mention that I do so
‘remotely’ and not, first, privately to him, communicating with him
personally --- especially since I knew him personally --- prior to going
‘public’? And how is this related to our ‘split’, we essentially
ending in a schism?
I don’t want to get overly detailed. Not least because I
don’t wish to needlessly detract from another’s reputation or
character. On the other hand, if the reader is to understand… and the
reader really is Roman Catholic… then you require enough details in order
to see what happened and why I now dare to publicly (as obscure as I am…) admonish him, including, leastwise
tangentially, his small band of followers. Comprehending?
I am truly Catholic. But I don’t pretend to be a saint or an
ecclesial leader.
I’m just trying to be a good Catholic and say what is needed
to be heard.
I want to be fair & charitable --- including any I admonish. Even him.
So what happened? When I converted to Roman Catholicism out of
nowhere, in the middle of gigantic
These people are not really Catholic. Not even the most
‘conservative’ of them.
Shocking? Yes. For those supposedly
‘catholic’ and not fathoming apostasy.
It took me another 2½ years to fully see John Paul II
wasn’t truly Catholic.
That’s 4 years total. No ‘overnight’ whim. I took
a long cautious while.
The point? I then removed myself from religious
association with such obviously & blatantly non-Catholic (indeed, anti-Catholic!) people. Oh,
don’t get me wrong. I still socialized with many of them, being polite
& nice. Being a real Catholic doesn’t mean you automatically become
‘militant’ and ‘jerkish’. Yet I did comprehend that
they were not what they
claimed to be. Again, why? Because they plainly contradicted what most ancient Catholics of all, during the
first millennium, plainly believed, meant & upheld. Plainly! Doesn’t take a genius. Just simple,
obvious & sensible reasoning. What then? Figuring out why the
‘pope’ wasn’t acting or talking like
a real pope. Mind you, it’s totally possible for a real pope to be
a bad pope. That’s not what I’m talking about.
Contrarily, why is John Paul
publicly opposing Catholicity
at times --- and nobody
bothers blinking an eyeball, reacting as if he’s said and done something appalling? What’s going on?
That’s what led me to the truth & factuality of
interregnumism
.
This is what took me places undreamt, wife in tow and burgeoning
family, to face an astonishingly harsh reality… that we’re in the
long foretold Great Apostasy, wherein Christ’s Ecclesial Body undergoes
precisely what Her Master, Jesus the God-Man, underwent on earth at the Hill of
the Skull upon the Cross --- brutal Crucifixion & Entombment. Disciples
scattered, seemingly defeated, satan
‘winning’ the day.
I did not dare to presume the following out of nowhere.
Nevertheless, for a couple of years, without proof to the contrary, I had to
wonder: am I the only real Roman
Catholic on earth right now? You may have no idea how lonely that
feels. Yes, miraculously, my wife converted, too. (I converted and literally thought, at the time of this fateful decision, that she might divorce because of this.) She
assures me she would never have divorced me, and I believe her. But it was a real fear that I had to face at
the time… do I choose God & His One True Religion, or wife & family here on
earth? Enormous quandary!
A dear friend at the time, Ron Kramig (who I also, sadly, must admonish, about which you may read
here),
and his mother, went through this awful tribulation with me. He, too, converted
not so very long after me, his mother following his footsteps. (My wife wanted to convert before then, in
fairness to her, but, super cautious, I made sure she devoured & grasped
the Roman Catechism before she did so, receiving the Sacrament of Baptism.)
After two years of this unique situation, I made an astounding discovery on the
still fairly new internet. There was someone out there who believed in Roman
Catholicism just like us! This was in very early 2003. The person I discovered?
Mr. Richard Ibranyi. Yes, he had a website and was broadcasting his convictions
to the world. What astounded me was, one, that he was the first person, other
than myself, that I found to both uphold Salvation Dogma in its ancient,
narrow & correct sense (‘no
Salvation outside the Church’, with no ifs, ands or buts, or any
qualifications) and acknowledge that the antipopes after Vatican II
were not in any way actually popes, being not in any way actually Roman
Catholic Whole, Entire & Undefiled. And, two, that
he seemed to be humble enough to correct himself publicly when he
realized that he had been wrong.
This intrigued me to no end, whilst natural caution made me
hesitate as I studied.
Studied his already large website, searching very,
very carefully to make sure.
Sure that he really was what he appeared to be, and that I
wasn’t suckered in.
Ah, scrumptious irony. For all my caution, still
suckered in. In what way? Poor Ron
Kramig’s mother could not wait for me to make up my mind. After nearly a
year and a half, she impulsively telephoned Mr. Ibranyi and established
communication. What did I do in response? Mmmm… fateful
decisions. I decided, mistakenly, that this was, perhaps, the Will of
God being expressed. Maybe I was taking too long. Maybe I was too cautious.
Maybe this was His Way of showing me that it was time. Time
to make contact. Time to establish relations with what I had hardly
dared to hope, up until then at the beginning of the 21st century,
was possible --- that real & genuine Roman Catholics, in the wake of an
execrable Vatican II Pseudo-Council embracing the Religion of Modernism, could
truly exist apart from myself, my friend, his mother, and my (catechumenal)
wife, as well as my children who, while still very young, were already properly
& validly baptized.
For a year and a half after this, I had experienced mostly pleasant
relations with Mr. Richard Ibranyi and his cohorts in southern
I did have at least two warnings, though. Around the time he
visited us in
Well, he certainly did admonish us. Yet
charitably? No, not at all. It was very cruel.
This is where I should have seen straight. This was the sign of an
unstable person.
Unfortunately, my dreams of living & working with them impeded
me. I fatefully & doggedly, despite my wife’s poor pleas, sealed my
decision to move to
We were trapped. It was an excruciating 2 or 3 days. My wife &
I talked deeply.
I finally recognized --- this
man is not truly just,
charitable or reasonable.
For merely daring to defend my wife, or to ask to
talk to him directly…
Wham! I was guilty, too, per him. Without him
getting my input first.
This was beyond the pale. He demanded that my wife live as if
imprisoned, ‘penitentially’ for her purported
‘misdeeds’. He would not, not!, for the life of him, simply allow
me to talk to him personally, learning what the claimed ‘evidence’
was against my wife for her terrible ‘crime’, per them, and
instantly accused me of being ‘guilty’ of protecting a grievous
‘sinner’ merely because I dared to defend my spouse against the
horrific accusation made against her… and in spite of them never, during
a self-styled ‘investigation’ of the accusation, ever bothering to
get my testimony in this matter. Fair & impartial?
True Catholic charity, and according to the laws of the Church? I think not. My
wife & I were faced with a choice. I either acquiesce
to their demands, and, in doing so, have my wife, against her deepest
conscience, tell a mortal lie about herself by publicly admitting that
their accusation was ‘true’. Or, I politely tell them,
“Enough!” And, in doing so, have not enough money to take my
family to safety.
We chose the latter. Better to trust in the Hands of God than the
hands of men.
God, after all, is merciful & charitable. Not always, I’m
afraid, Mr. Ibranyi.
Having issued a courteous yet firm decision to Richard, their tone
suddenly changed. Suddenly he and another member would drive some 200 to 300
miles to speak to me in person. Too late for us, though. I had already learned
what kind of people they were. Persons who would investigate & accuse you
behind your backs, leaving you no opportunity at all to defend yourselves,
deigning to sentence, punish & bully.
On a wing and a prayer we escaped this hideous situation. I got my
old job back even; then promptly got laid off during the Great Recession.
Miraculously, though, for seven months, the Triune God of the Catholic Church,
along with His Heavenly Mother, took tender care of us and I had seven amazing
months to be a fulltime apologist for the One True Religion, starting this
website, The Epistemologic Works, so as to explain and defend Catholicism in
the face of an apostate world. Worthy? Only time will
tell.
Meanwhile, the facts are the facts. Heaven has allowed all of this
to happen.
Yet aside from Mr. Ibranyi’s terrible & uncharitable
behavior toward us, what are his serious problems? I know him too well to be
able to list everything. And even were I to list everything I know, his website
& other materials are way too much --- and not nearly justifiable enough
for me to scour from one end to the other --- in order to be completely
thorough. But I don’t need utter thoroughness. All I need is some truly
dangerous things.
Howsoever, to be fair, please believe me --- Richard Ibranyi is sincere. Less
and less accurate & right, but earnest.
I know him too well to be mistaken about this part of his character.
Unfortunately, he’s like a loose cannon. Zealous
for what he claims is true, but lacking adequate wisdom, patience or
understanding in enough things. He is surrounded by ‘yes’ people,
mostly too in awe of him to dare to disagree with him, and he too often shoots
before he thinks. To attack is his constant modus
operandi. He had a lot of good things to say at first, and there is still lots of true stuff on his website or other
materials. Which is exactly what makes him more difficult to
figure out, for those who are truly Catholic and crave guidance, and more deadly
in the end for any who follow blindly. Whilst this doesn’t begin
to count up the number of mostly innocent folks he’s hurt.
Because he attracts other militant people like himself to himself,
or overawes those unable to sort out the good stuff from the bad stuff. In my
case, it was the astonishment I’d felt as seeing someone else, out of the
blue, in the middle of the Great Apostasy, put two truths together that no one
else seemed to realize --- that there
really is ‘no Salvation outside the Church’, no
ifs, ands or buts, and that the ‘popes’ are antipopes, not
actually Roman Catholic Whole & Entire after a Vatican II
Pseudo-Council, thus automatically excommunicating themselves, if really
& publicly Catholic to begin with. This, plus a willingness to admit
when he was mistaken, and overwhelmingly good stuff he had posted at the
beginning, which I amazingly found, is what drew me in originally.
So what shall I say? What’s worthwhile, and sufficient, to
warn other people?
The behavior & incidents described above should be like a large
scarlet flag.
Yet let us go a little farther. Not just to ‘pick on’
Richard, but to help others.
In what way? Lest you
either fall for his grievous errors, or he scathes you.
(And believe me,
it is a painful ordeal. He can be very cruel, nasty & unjust.)
First, Mr. Richard
Ibranyi does not see those,
who align with him in some way, as ‘individual’ Catholics. That is,
you, as a Catholic, are not merely ‘aligned with’ him in every
infallible dogma of the
In other words, since Sacred Scripture clearly tells us how these
two men did not die
normally… they were taken up into Paradise above without dying… then it was often opined by the early
Church father how, in all likelihood, they
would be the two strange men appearing near the end of old earth, miraculously
preaching the Catholic Faith and punishing rebellious, anti-Catholic human
beings in jawdropping ways, till, nearing the conclusion of their mission, a
Luciferian humanity would be allowed to martyr them. Celebrating globally for
three days (counting inclusively, the
Catholic scholar logically assumes…), the apostate earth is then
shocked & astonished to see the Two Witnesses resurrect physically in front
of their eyes, being assumed bodily into Heaven. Which is, obviously, symbolic
of Jesus Christ’s Resurrection, and their final
act of self-sacrifice.
This is what Mr. Ibranyi started daring to claim for himself as I
became acquainted with him in the mid-’00s, and, after the unpleasant
experience at their hands, my family barely able to survive by Jesus &
Mary’s Mercy in the wake of this fiasco, Richard then started publicly
claiming on behalf of his adherent, Mr. Will Norris, as the second of the pair
of apocalyptic witnesses, Will publicly affirming his agreement with Mr.
Ibranyi about the matter (although, as
far as I can tell, Mr. Norris hesitated for awhile, taking some time before
daring to claim it himself). How did this affect me prior to
leaving, though?
I privately thought it odd, while there, that Richard would so
publicly & confidently proclaim such a thing, despite displaying no great & irrefutable
prophecies or miracles, backing up
his claim inarguably as a Catholic. Notwithstanding, I demurred, supposing,
perhaps, that this was yet another test of my humility & virtue, and that,
in any case, the inexorable passage of time would reveal the truth eventually. Anyhow, hadn’t
Richard several times publicly admitted some mistaken assertion that he had
held? If mistaken about this, supposed I, then, too, he’d humbly admit it
and move on, a better man.
Again, in retrospect, quite naïve of me. I had
overlooked and was blind to this:
That, while Mr. Ibranyi did not say so plainly & openly,
he surely DID, nonetheless,
demonstrate, by his public action around ‘Mary’s Little Remnant’,
that he viewed us as monastic or semi-monastic, that he was, inarguably,
the ‘ABBOT’ and thus in authority
over us (he being one of the Two
Witnesses, recall), and that, as a result, what he decreed was NOT to be disagreed with in a
significant way --- especially if you’re just a newbie to his
group --- and that he could DETERMINE
OUR FATES as he saw fit, being above & beyond any ecclesiastical law.
Indeed, often IGNORANT of Church
Law.
Second, while
undeniably sincere & zealous for what he conceives as the ‘catholic
religion’ (I apostrophe the phrase
because, whilst he was truly Catholic at first and said some necessary &
good things to start with, he has definitely deviated into rank schism
of late, if not outright heresy), he, like the Dimond brothers with
whom he was associated in the 1990s, being one of their ‘monks’,
was incipiently
Catholic fundamentalist
(CF), and more & more so as the
years have gone by. You may follow the link just given to find a relatively
short & pithy description of CFs. The heart of their problem is arrogance
allied with ignorance and a lack of patience to hear someone politely &
intelligently explain to them where they’ve gone astray, or are mistaken.
Allied with this propensity is a massive willingness to ‘blast into
smithereens’ anyone who has the audacity to disagree with them and
regardless of how courteously, charitably & intelligently or factually so.
Or, to put it differently, they attack you cruelly with utmost spleen &
venom. This Mr. Ibranyi has done zealously for years. I witnessed it from afar;
I witnessed it up close several times; and I’ve witnessed it from afar
again in the past decade. So what did I think of it then?
It made me uncomfortable sometimes, but it also was appealing, in a
way, seeing someone who, surprisingly, was right about so many things at the
time that no one else could seem to get figured out correctly. It was militant,
and that can be attractive when you’re sick at heart of seeing lies &
evil get their way for decades on end in the wake of the damnable Vatican II
Pseudo-Council. I also thought, “What if he really is a prophet chosen by
God to champion the Saving Truth?” Couldn’t be sure then, yet I
couldn’t simply rule it out automatically. Ergo, I simultaneously
tolerated it whilst a wee bit uncomfortable, too. Confusing? Welcome to the
world we inhabit. Especially in the greatest apostasy ever known to humankind,
apart from, barely, pre-Flood times.
Of course, after his heinous treatment of my wife, myself, and my
family, my view necessarily changed. I didn’t instantly cleanse myself of
all this bellicose rhetoric (some of my
earliest writings on The Epistemologic Works can seem a bit overly strident ---
I’d certainly phrase them at least a little differently now…),
but I was never him. I simply am not fond of ‘blasting’ anyone or
giving them no chance to speak up for themselves, nicely & intelligently,
with civility. On the other hand, real Catholics are, occasionally,
required to mince no words. Read some of the martyrs’ words, as
they’re threatened and tortured, if you don’t believe me. I
therefore try to strike a balance. This has never been Richard’s
inclination. He loves to blast & savage, and doesn’t appear to be
‘moderating’ over long years. Having gotten to know him from 2003
to 2007, talking with him privately, asking him many questions about his early
history, I can speculate intelligently about this. He’s from the
Northeastern Corridor of the
Not that Richard isn’t intelligent. He is. But
he’s Northeastern Corridor and a hard scrapping, urban,
out-hustle-everyone-else, street fighting,
endowed-with-a-sense-of-great-purpose gentleman. In a word, a crusading
soldier. Under proper training and a decent ecclesiastical authority, he could
be a marvelous asset to the Church. And loyal devotees, as few as they are,
apparently, serve him assiduously, a tremendous asset for him and his side. For
them, his bellicose blasts are simply proof of how evil everyone else is who is
at the receiving end of his verbal bombshells, and of how brave & truly
chosen by God he must be so as to be willing & able to dare to talk that
way. And, if that’s not enough, a lot of what he says --- even today ---
is correct. He has points.
Right about everything? No.
Increasingly wrong lately? Yes. Very confusing?
To say the least. Particularly for hungry souls or real Catholics looking for
answers.
The belligerent attacks, though, are over the top. Too often, they
are simply cruel & uncalled for. Mostly, they defy what good Church
teaching & practice require of real Catholics, whether of some authority
& jurisdiction, or merely lowly laypersons.
This is another reason to be extremely wary of Richard Ibranyi
& his followers.
Third, he makes up
‘heresies’ out of nowhere. The most obvious is his by now very
routine charge of ‘theophilosophy’. And what is this? Per him, as
far as I’ve been able to comprehend --- and trying my best to be fair to
him and his position --- it’s inducting that which we may call
‘philosophy’ into the practice of Catholic theology. Really,
though, it must be understood that his conception of ‘philosophy’
is rather tainted… and limited. In his mind, as far as I’m able to
ascertain, philosophy is nothing but ‘pagan’, period. Too,
he’s rather surly and filled with animosity against those who are
academics. On the one hand, to be fair to him, I do sympathize. Modernist
scholars can be haughty, wicked, ill-willed & massively insane all at the
same time. This is a symptom of living during the Great Apostasy, with demonic
influence, lies & evil everywhere, unchecked. Hence, whilst the highly
educated scholar can be very intelligent, this intelligence is warped, twisted,
bent & misshaped toward the worst of all iniquity and anti-Catholicity.
All the same, does this mean that there is nothing good or useful in scholarship?
Or ‘philosophy’, if this much misunderstood word is
fathomed correctly?
Of course not. No humble, learned or wise
Catholic could think so.
This is where Mr. Richard Ibranyi --- and his adherents --- go so wrong when it comes to their accusation of a
made-up-out-of-nowhere ‘heresy’ of ‘theophilosophy’.
Mind you, we’re not pretending it’s black
or white. He does have some points. Which makes it yet more
confusing for the poor soul who reads or listens to his diatribes, not having a
real ability to sort out the true from the false. Indeed, his writings
& words are voluminous now, far too numerous & complex for even the
well-trained Catholic to sort through. ’Twould take a truly gargantuan
effort now, for several real Catholic scholars, over untold numbers of years,
to really & fairly sort out the good from the bad. I haven’t strength
& time to spare for this effort. All I can say is, “Beware.”
It’s perilous.
Because ‘philosophy’ just means
‘love of wisdom’ in ancient Greek. And, since
humankind has the Law of Natural Reason divinely written upon our hearts, then
paganistic human beings, with enough intelligence, time & effort, can come
up with plenty of good stuff, too, in the area of philosophy. Albeit, being
pagan or otherwise blinded toward real Catholicity, then you’re almost
certainly going to run into lots of mistaken or evil stuff as well. That’s
the catch. Earliest Catholics were often converts from rank paganism and
anti-Catholicity. Resultantly, if highly trained & learned, then they would
have this pre-Catholic learning & philosophy. Quite naturally, they would
frequently use it in their writings or ponderings, trying to sort out the good
from the bad… with varying degrees of success. A learned convert to real
Roman Catholicity faces a similar challenge today. You can’t just
make-believe that you don’t know what you do truly know. But you also
can’t willy nilly take what you know, from long education or thought, as
surely ‘good’ or ‘true’ without examining it carefully,
seeing if it’s decent, worthwhile to fit into the framework of Roman
Catholicism & Her Infallible Dogmas. Savvy? Someone like Mr. Ibranyi ---
and other CFs like him --- don’t get this.
What’s more, they haven’t the wisdom, patience, learning or charity
to evaluate philosophy in perfect fairness. They’ve got a great big chip
on their shoulders, limited understanding, and a prejudice against anything
that they don’t already accept as Catholic and correct. Consequently,
like loose cannons, they go around blasting, with guns blazing, at any notion
or person who they don’t like… and whether or not it’s accurate
& fair. Or, alternatively put, they don’t care who they slander, who
they misrepresent, or who they’ve hurt & brutalized unjustly. They
are mental, verbal & social savages.
Not stupid, mind you. Not necessarily. Just
uncivilized, barbaric savages.
And so Richard Ibranyi has, of late, condemned pretty much all
(if not all) of the scholastic theologians, a whole
lot of the early Church fathers,
and all for sake of ‘protecting’ his so-called
‘catholicity’ against the threat of ‘theophilosophy’, a
made up term and made up ‘heresy’. He may sometimes, or at least
once in awhile, have a half way good point. Maybe. Yet
this is why his version of the ‘roman catholic church’ is totally
denuded of around half,
maybe, of the saints, doctors,
fathers & theologians. Because he accuses them of the
‘heresy’ of ‘theophilosophy’ and thinks they are then
automatically excommunicated, if Catholic to begin with. For
instance, St. Thomas Aquinas.
Or
Understanding the peril? The deadly evil that he
indulges? I hope so.
Which brings us to, fourth, his version of interregnumism. Remember that?
You may read about the evidence for it
here.
It’s shocking to most
people, who can’t imagine that God would punish His Own for being
relentlessly, wantonly & carelessly bad for untold centuries --- and even
though he did the very exact thing in the Old Testament, having the Chaldeans
come in and take over Jerusalem and all Palestine with a gigantic army, after a
horrific siege, and, killing most people, then carting off most of the rest to
Babylon. Plus, pulling down the protective walls of
Typically, though, when God punishes like this, it is unto the third
or fourth generation. Not indefinitely, or perpetually. I.e., He eventually
exhausts His Wrath and His Mercy, at this time, returns. A generation defined
as anywhere between 20 and 30 years, then what, prithee, does this amount to? Right, anywhere from 60 to 80 years (3 x 20 = 60 and 4 x 20 = 80), or 90 to 120 years at the
very most (3 x 30 = 90 and 4 x 30 = 120,
natch). The ‘Babylonian Exile’ of the apostate
Israelites, for instance, was a little less than about 70 years. Yet why 3 to 4 generations?
Because by then, the 3rd or 4th generation, the people so
hideously offensive to God --- the ultimately wicked & apostate
generation --- is dead, and, if a very few of them not dead, then having
suffered a long & horrible penance, sorry for, and humbly admitting, their grotesque
iniquities. Meanwhile, the 3rd or 4th generation has had
plenty of time, at least some of them, to figure out what
happened, figure out just why it happened (because our forefathers were so extraordinarily wicked, hard
hearted & totally clueless), and, coming to their collective (or adequately numerous) senses, at this
point, realizing they need to throw themselves in abject humility upon their
knees, begging for God’s Forgiveness & Mercy. That’s where
we’re at right now, during the Great Apostasy. Seeing how abominable
Antipope Francis is openly becoming, more, slowly ever more, persons…
styling themselves as ‘catholic’… are slowly, like snails,
ever so slowly realizing just how bad things really are and just how bad
Our Creator is willing to let them get, until we finally get things right.
Vatican II ended in 1965. Have we yet reached the limits of God’s Wrath?
Not quite. We’re in the transition phase. At fifty-four years
altogether now (almost), we can
expect, probably, another 16 years --- perchance 20 or 30 or 40 (beyond this I find it dubious, in spite of
our horrific sin, the thirty year generational estimate merely being an
outside, most extreme boundary & most definitely not what I
guess to be most likely) of God’s Wrath. Then the horrible Great
Apostasy finished, we enter the utmost final phase of human history, if
I grasp prophecy correctly, and God acts as all of the evidence leads me to
conclude. Oh, incidentally, the 3 to 4 generation principle? Straight
from Sacred Scripture.
You might want to read it sometime. It’s amazing what you can
find out.
Whereas Mr. Richard Ibranyi, purported ‘witness of the
apocalypse’ which he claims Christ has made him, now also claims ---
since 2013, apparently, and some 6 years after our personal acquaintance broke
off rather suddenly --- that God has allowed St. Peter’s Throne to sit
empty since AD 1130. You read correctly. Per him, Our Lord has been punishing
us for nearly 800 years unbroken. That’s some 30 to 40 generations.
Conservatively estimated, to be as fair as possible
to poor Mr. Ibranyi.
And why, why has Richard gone to this extent at this point in time?
Well, there are several reasons, as far as I can tell. But
it’s painful trolling through his materials (not to mention dangerous…), and I haven’t time to
spare to do so regularly & thoroughly. Plus, while there may be extra
information on his videos or etc., I’ve never preferred watching videos
or listening to podcasts (although I do
like some podcasts), since they tend to bore me, and always have since I
was a teenager. It’s little known, nevertheless, psychologists have
shown, in controlled experiments, that people who receive their news through
video or TV are less well
informed than those who get knowledge of the news via reading reputable & smart digital or print sources.
Surprised? You oughtn’t to be.
Hence, reading --- if it’s well written --- is most
informative.
Most of the time. Not always.
It’s not totally cut-and-dried.
So don’t be a prig or Catholic fundamentalist about it.
In any case, Mr. Ibranyi’s non-reading materials may shed
more light on his various fateful decisions. Notwithstanding, his written
sources are more than enough to reveal what his thinking has been. Antipope Anacletus II began his
false rule in AD 1130, he pretty much fooling the entire membership
of the Roman Catholic Church at the time. Only the miraculous & dogged
efforts of Ss. Bernard of Clairvaux & Norbert slowly disabused Catholics of their terribly mistaken notions
about Anacletus, the debacle ending after some
10 years of massive confusion & confrontation. Yes, that is,
‘shockingly’, what God let Catholics fall into, that
far back in history.
Very instructive. Unfortunately,
Mr. Richard Ibranyi took it and, along with his made-up-out-of-nowhere
‘heresy’ --- aforesaid ‘theophilosophy’, plus,
perchance, some other CF ideas, too --- then concluded, horribly awry,
that God never returned a rightful Roman Bishop to St.
Peter’s Throne, He instead permitting His Church to be without
a real & legitimate shepherd --- a true pope --- FOR
NEARLY 8 CENTURIES STRAIGHT.
Getting it? And that’s not everything, even. Other
repercussions follow.
For example, because he’s concluded this… that
there’s been no real pope for almost eight hundred years… then
anyone who has acknowledged the supposed ‘antipopes’, that he claims
God has permitted to fool everyone for 800 years, is, ipso facto, in
‘apostasy’. Um hm. You’ve got it.
Dare to say Innocent III in the 1200s was a pope? Then, per Mr. Ibranyi,
you’re a heretic, schismatic or apostate and certainly not Catholic for
doing so. Have the audacity to honor Pius V as a pope in the 1500s? The same. He will blast & scathe you as non-Catholic for
doing so. Or Leo XIII in the 1800s? Likewise.
This includes saints & doctors.
St. Teresa of
Both unparalleled and unforetold. He is the
first, prophetically or presently.
But, then, he’s the ‘apocalyptic witness’, eh? As he would have it.
And even without
any globally jawdropping miracles.
I’d say he’s on thin ice. Really,
really, really thin.
By the way, while it’s been some years since I’ve
interacted with Mr. Ibranyi in person, from viewing processional pics on his
site, it seems he’s kept a similar style & demeanor. This is for the
cautious reader to be able to identify him and be wary --- not to attack him or mock him. He sports very severely cut
& short hair on his head, with a large, flowing, patriarchal beard. He must
be around 60 years old now, but, as far as I can see, he still continues to
maintain his strong & capable physique. He’s tall. If friendly toward
you,
At any rate, you see the peril. You perceive the threat. You
understand, I trust, the astonishing confusion, deception, schism and (potentially, leastwise) the true heresy
his position now represents and leads into. For Mr. Richard Ibranyi and his
fervent followers to obstinately deny real ecclesial authority and
jurisdiction, however many centuries ago particular popes or bishops reigned,
when, with adequate intelligence, you could (and
ought to!) know better, amounts to a vile & reprehensible schism.
The other side of heresy; both are damnable. If adequately intelligent,
this is NOT ever
‘excusable’.
See the danger? Mr. Richard Ibranyi is a pied piper, leading souls
to hell forever.
This is why I warn, this is why I admonish, and this is why I
digitally publish.
But why not personal communication to him first, given former
relations?
Initially, after saving my family, I wanted to watch carefully
& closely.
Then seeing he was only getting worse, I prayed & pondered.
And frankly, this admonishment is extremely unpleasant.
I really don’t take pleasure in it. It’s not fun.
But I realized, given enough time & evidence, how he would
respond. The same approach he always takes --- blast away, savagely. He’s a public figure, by his own
free will choice. I am therefore not obligated to personally
communicate with him again. And, without heavenly guidance to the contrary, my conscience
is utterly free to choose this course of action. If he reads it,
fine. I devoutly hope, pray & ask for
his salvation! May Heaven pour graces into his heart & mind, converting
him back to real Catholicism. Howsoever, if he
doesn’t, then you, at a bare minimum, dear & beloved soul, have received
intelligent & factual warning about him, knowing the peril. And I tell you:
Beware Richard Ibranyi & ‘Mary’s Little
Remnant’, his fervent adherents.
They are not
truly Roman Catholic anymore, and they are perilous.
But if you’ve any hard facts to the contrary, please tell me.
Courteously, of course, and with civilized
intelligence.
And pray for him & they, that they be
Catholic again.
Otherwise, the facts are quite clear. He’s Bad News.
Luciferianly so… furthering the Great Apostasy.
+
+ +
Pilate’s
query met:
Note:
if you’ve come
to this webpage directly from a search
engine or other
website, then, when done viewing this webpage
--- and assuming
you wish to view more of this website’s pages ---
please type the
website’s address (as given above right before this
note) into the
address bar at the top of your browser and hit the
‘enter’ button on the keyboard of your computer.
Please go here about use of the writings
on this website.
© 2019 by
Paul Doughton.
All rights
reserved.